These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26233530)

  • 21. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.
    Ambrosecchia M; Marino BF; Gawryszewski LG; Riggio L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():283. PubMed ID: 26042018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceiving objects by their function: An EEG study on feature saliency and prehensile affordances.
    Kourtis D; Vingerhoets G
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Sep; 110():138-47. PubMed ID: 26247331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge.
    Netelenbos N; Gonzalez CL
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Feb; 93():18-25. PubMed ID: 25483823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interrupted object-based updating of reach program leads to a negative compatibility effect.
    Vainio L
    J Mot Behav; 2009 Jul; 41(4):305-15. PubMed ID: 19508957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions.
    Cho DT; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):737-49. PubMed ID: 21500949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of visual attention in action priming.
    Vainio L; Ellis R; Tucker M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Feb; 60(2):241-61. PubMed ID: 17455057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.
    Saccone EJ; Churches O; Nicholls ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1643-53. PubMed ID: 27668425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An electrophysiological study of the object-based correspondence effect: is the effect triggered by an intended grasping action?
    Lien MC; Jardin E; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1862-82. PubMed ID: 23918551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pixel asymmetry predicts between-object differences in the object-based compatibility effect.
    Azaad S; Laham SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2376-2388. PubMed ID: 32705950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The premotor theory of attention as an account for the Simon effect.
    Van der Lubbe RH; Abrahamse EL; De Kleine E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 22426428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account.
    Pellicano A; Lugli L; Binkofski F; Rubichi S; Iani C; Nicoletti R
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1383-1399. PubMed ID: 29651534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic Recruitment of the Motor System by Undetected Graspable Objects: A Motor-evoked Potential Study.
    McNair NA; Behrens AD; Harris IM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 28686138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.
    Tucker M; Ellis R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):830-46. PubMed ID: 9627419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A picture says more than a thousand words: behavioural and ERP evidence for attentional enhancements due to action affordances.
    Adamo M; Ferber S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1600-8. PubMed ID: 18682258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A meta-analysis of the object-based compatibility effect.
    Azaad S; Laham SM; Shields P
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():105-127. PubMed ID: 31071502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An attentional mechanism for selecting appropriate actions afforded by graspable objects.
    Loach D; Frischen A; Bruce N; Tsotsos JK
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1253-7. PubMed ID: 19121133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrophysiological examination of embodiment in vision and action.
    Goslin J; Dixon T; Fischer MH; Cangelosi A; Ellis R
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Feb; 23(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 22241814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: the effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state.
    Pellicano A; Iani C; Borghi AM; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2190-201. PubMed ID: 20589580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the relations between affordance and representation of the agent's effector.
    Barbieri F; Buonocore A; Bernardis P; Volta RD; Gentilucci M
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(3):421-33. PubMed ID: 17268769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.