157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26233766)
21. Fate and effects of sediment-associated triclosan in subtropical freshwater microcosms.
Peng FJ; Diepens NJ; Pan CG; Bracewell SA; Ying GG; Salvito D; Selck H; Van den Brink PJ
Aquat Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 202():117-125. PubMed ID: 30025380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Deriving the aquatic predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) of three chlorophenols for the Taihu Lake, China.
Lei BL; Huang SB; Jin XW; Wang Z
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010 Dec; 45(14):1823-31. PubMed ID: 20936560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Triclosan inhibits arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in three wetland plants.
Twanabasu BR; Smith CM; Stevens KJ; Venables BJ; Sears WC
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Mar; 447():450-7. PubMed ID: 23410867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Species sensitivity distribution evaluation for chronic nickel toxicity to marine organisms.
DeForest DK; Schlekat CE
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):580-9. PubMed ID: 23553986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Occurrence, degradation and potential ecological risks of triclosan in environment.].
Zhang LN; Gong XS; An J; Wei SH
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2018 Sep; 29(9):3139-3146. PubMed ID: 30411592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biochemical and genotoxic effect of triclosan on earthworms (Eisenia fetida) using contact and soil tests.
Lin D; Xie X; Zhou Q; Liu Y
Environ Toxicol; 2012 Jul; 27(7):385-92. PubMed ID: 22707219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Responses of earthworms and microbial communities in their guts to Triclosan.
Ma L; Xie Y; Han Z; Giesy JP; Zhang X
Chemosphere; 2017 Feb; 168():1194-1202. PubMed ID: 27810239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Deriving a water quality guideline for protection of aquatic communities exposed to triclosan in the Canadian environment.
Hill KL; Breton RL; Manning GE; Teed RS; Capdevielle M; Slezak B
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Jul; 14(4):437-441. PubMed ID: 29528192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk assessment of triclosan released from sewage treatment plants in European rivers using a combination of risk quotient methodology and Monte Carlo simulation.
Thomaidi VS; Matsoukas C; Stasinakis AS
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 603-604():487-494. PubMed ID: 28641188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ecotoxicity of triclosan in soil: an approach using different species.
Ramires PF; Tavella RA; Escarrone AL; Volcão LM; Honscha LC; de Lima Brum R; da Silva AB; da Silva Júnior FMR
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(30):41233-41241. PubMed ID: 33782822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Critical review on the environmental behaviors and toxicity of triclosan and its removal technologies.
Jiang Y; Liu L; Jin B; Liu Y; Liang X
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 932():173013. PubMed ID: 38719041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of elevated temperature and decreased soil moisture content on triclosan ecotoxicity to earthworm E. fetida.
Miškelytė D; Žaltauskaitė J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(17):51018-51029. PubMed ID: 36807863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Searching for a more sensitive earthworm species to be used in pesticide homologation tests - a meta-analysis.
Pelosi C; Joimel S; Makowski D
Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):895-900. PubMed ID: 23084259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Insights into the sediment toxicity of personal care products to freshwater oligochaete worms using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
Peng FJ; Hu LX; Pan CG; Ying GG; Van den Brink PJ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 May; 172():296-302. PubMed ID: 30716664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contribution for the derivation of a soil screening value (SSV) for uranium, using a natural reference soil.
Caetano AL; Marques CR; Gavina A; Carvalho F; Gonçalves F; da Silva EF; Pereira R
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e108041. PubMed ID: 25353962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Novel Approach to Derive the Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC) of Benzophenone-3 (BP-3) Using the Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) Method: Suggestion of a New PNEC Value for BP-3.
Jung JW; Kang JS; Choi J; Park JW
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33807469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Systematic Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Wigger H; Kawecki D; Nowack B; Adam V
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 31535755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Conventional assessment factor method vs. species sensitivity distribution method.
Sorgog K; Kamo M
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Nov; 183():109494. PubMed ID: 31376805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predicted no-effect concentration and risk assessment for 17-[beta]-estradiol in waters of China.
Wu F; Fang Y; Li Y; Cui X; Zhang R; Guo G; Giesy JP
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 228():31-56. PubMed ID: 24162091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ecotoxicological evaluation of the risk posed by bisphenol A, triclosan, and 4-nonylphenol in coastal waters using early life stages of marine organisms (Isochrysis galbana, Mytilus galloprovincialis, Paracentrotus lividus, and Acartia clausi).
Tato T; Salgueiro-González N; León VM; González S; Beiras R
Environ Pollut; 2018 Jan; 232():173-182. PubMed ID: 28951039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
