287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26234156)
1. RAG Represents a Widespread Threat to the Lymphocyte Genome.
Teng G; Maman Y; Resch W; Kim M; Yamane A; Qian J; Kieffer-Kwon KR; Mandal M; Ji Y; Meffre E; Clark MR; Cowell LG; Casellas R; Schatz DG
Cell; 2015 Aug; 162(4):751-65. PubMed ID: 26234156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recruitment of RAG1 and RAG2 to Chromatinized DNA during V(D)J Recombination.
Shetty K; Schatz DG
Mol Cell Biol; 2015 Nov; 35(21):3701-13. PubMed ID: 26303526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immature Lymphocytes Inhibit
Fisher MR; Rivera-Reyes A; Bloch NB; Schatz DG; Bassing CH
J Immunol; 2017 Apr; 198(7):2943-2956. PubMed ID: 28213501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repair of chromosomal RAG-mediated DNA breaks by mutant RAG proteins lacking phosphatidylinositol 3-like kinase consensus phosphorylation sites.
Gapud EJ; Lee BS; Mahowald GK; Bassing CH; Sleckman BP
J Immunol; 2011 Aug; 187(4):1826-34. PubMed ID: 21742970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synergistic requirement of orphan nonamer-like elements and DNA bending enhanced by HMGB1 for RAG-mediated nicking at cryptic 12-RSS but not authentic 12-RSS.
Numata M; Nagata K
Genes Cells; 2011 Aug; 16(8):879-95. PubMed ID: 21740486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA cleavage of a cryptic recombination signal sequence by RAG1 and RAG2. Implications for partial V(H) gene replacement.
Rahman NS; Godderz LJ; Stray SJ; Capra JD; Rodgers KK
J Biol Chem; 2006 May; 281(18):12370-80. PubMed ID: 16531612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A non-B DNA can replace heptamer of V(D)J recombination when present along with a nonamer: implications in chromosomal translocations and cancer.
Nishana M; Raghavan SC
Biochem J; 2012 Nov; 448(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 22891626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. RAG2 abolishes RAG1 aggregation to facilitate V(D)J recombination.
Gan T; Wang Y; Liu Y; Schatz DG; Hu J
Cell Rep; 2021 Oct; 37(2):109824. PubMed ID: 34644584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RAG-mediated V(D)J recombination is not essential for tumorigenesis in Atm-deficient mice.
Petiniot LK; Weaver Z; Vacchio M; Shen R; Wangsa D; Barlow C; Eckhaus M; Steinberg SM; Wynshaw-Boris A; Ried T; Hodes RJ
Mol Cell Biol; 2002 May; 22(9):3174-7. PubMed ID: 11940674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HMGB1/2 can target DNA for illegitimate cleavage by the RAG1/2 complex.
Zhang M; Swanson PC
BMC Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 10():24. PubMed ID: 19317908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. It takes two: communication between homologous alleles preserves genomic stability during V(D)J recombination.
Brandt VL; Hewitt SL; Skok JA
Nucleus; 2010; 1(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 21327101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nemo-Dependent, ATM-Mediated Signals from RAG DNA Breaks at
Glynn RA; Bassing CH
J Immunol; 2022 Jan; 208(2):371-383. PubMed ID: 34965965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mapping and Quantitation of the Interaction between the Recombination Activating Gene Proteins RAG1 and RAG2.
Zhang YH; Shetty K; Surleac MD; Petrescu AJ; Schatz DG
J Biol Chem; 2015 May; 290(19):11802-17. PubMed ID: 25745109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of RAG protein-V(D)J recombination signal interactions near the site of DNA cleavage by UV cross-linking.
Eastman QM; Villey IJ; Schatz DG
Mol Cell Biol; 1999 May; 19(5):3788-97. PubMed ID: 10207102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanistic basis for RAG discrimination between recombination sites and the off-target sites of human lymphomas.
Shimazaki N; Askary A; Swanson PC; Lieber MR
Mol Cell Biol; 2012 Jan; 32(2):365-75. PubMed ID: 22064481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. RAG1/2 induces genomic insertions by mobilizing DNA into RAG1/2-independent breaks.
Rommel PC; Oliveira TY; Nussenzweig MC; Robbiani DF
J Exp Med; 2017 Mar; 214(3):815-831. PubMed ID: 28179379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulation of RAG transposition.
Matthews AG; Oettinger MA
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2009; 650():16-31. PubMed ID: 19731798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. RAG1 targeting in the genome is dominated by chromatin interactions mediated by the non-core regions of RAG1 and RAG2.
Maman Y; Teng G; Seth R; Kleinstein SH; Schatz DG
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Nov; 44(20):9624-9637. PubMed ID: 27436288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The RAG2 C terminus suppresses genomic instability and lymphomagenesis.
Deriano L; Chaumeil J; Coussens M; Multani A; Chou Y; Alekseyenko AV; Chang S; Skok JA; Roth DB
Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7336):119-23. PubMed ID: 21368836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-consensus heptamer sequences destabilize the RAG post-cleavage complex, making ends available to alternative DNA repair pathways.
Arnal SM; Holub AJ; Salus SS; Roth DB
Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 May; 38(9):2944-54. PubMed ID: 20139091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
