These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26234391)
1. Clients' Perception of Outcome of Team-Based Prenatal and Reproductive Genetic Counseling in Serbian Service Using the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) Questionnaire. Cuturilo G; Vucinic OK; Novakovic I; Ignjatovic S; Mijovic M; Sulovic N; Vukolic D; Komnenic M; Tadic J; Cetkovic A; Belic A; Ljubic A J Genet Couns; 2016 Feb; 25(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 26234391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. Berkenstadt M; Shiloh S; Barkai G; Katznelson MB; Goldman B Am J Med Genet; 1999 Jan; 82(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 9916844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: reliability and validity of the instrument. Smets EM; Pieterse AH; Aalfs CM; Ausems MG; van Dulmen AM Am J Med Genet A; 2006 Apr; 140(8):843-50. PubMed ID: 16532462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parental factors in prenatal decision making and the impact of prenatal genetic counseling: a study on Turkish families. Simsek-Kiper PO; Utine GE; Volkan-Salanci B; Alanay Y; Aktaş D; Alikaşifoğlu M; Boduroğlu K; Tuncbilek E Genet Couns; 2014; 25(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 24783656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal counseling--implications of the cultural background of pregnant women on information processing, emotional response and acceptance. Tschudin S; Huang D; Mor-Gültekin H; Alder J; Bitzer J; Tercanli S Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E100-7. PubMed ID: 22187410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midwives' views on appropriate antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: do they match clients' preferences? Martin L; Hutton EK; Spelten ER; Gitsels-van der Wal JT; van Dulmen S Midwifery; 2014 Jun; 30(6):600-9. PubMed ID: 24100043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal counseling for congenital anomaly tests: parental preferences and perceptions of midwife performance. Martin L; Van Dulmen S; Spelten E; De Jonge A; De Cock P; Hutton E Prenat Diagn; 2013 Apr; 33(4):341-53. PubMed ID: 23447385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring experiences and expectations of prenatal health care and genetic counseling/testing in immigrant Latinas. Garza G; Hodges-Delgado P; Hoskovec J; Palos G; Wagner C; Zacharias N; Noblin SJ J Genet Couns; 2020 Aug; 29(4):530-541. PubMed ID: 32302061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions. Etchegary H; Potter B; Howley H; Cappelli M; Coyle D; Graham I; Walker M; Wilson B Genet Test; 2008 Mar; 12(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 18307384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clients' psychosocial communication and midwives' verbal and nonverbal communication during prenatal counseling for anomaly screening. Martin L; Gitsels-van der Wal JT; Pereboom MT; Spelten ER; Hutton EK; van Dulmen S Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jan; 99(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 26298217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nondirectiveness in prenatal genetics: patients read between the lines. Anderson G Nurs Ethics; 1999 Mar; 6(2):126-36. PubMed ID: 10358528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Directiveness in prenatal genetic counseling. Burke BM; Kolker A Women Health; 1994; 22(2):31-53. PubMed ID: 7645300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic counseling gone awry: miscommunication between prenatal genetic service providers and Mexican-origin clients. Browner CH; Preloran HM; Casado MC; Bass HN; Walker AP Soc Sci Med; 2003 May; 56(9):1933-46. PubMed ID: 12650730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Disclosing genetic risk for coronary heart disease: effects on perceived personal control and genetic counseling satisfaction. Robinson CL; Jouni H; Kruisselbrink TM; Austin EE; Christensen KD; Green RC; Kullo IJ Clin Genet; 2016 Feb; 89(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 25708169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproductive deliberation: Supporting autonomous decision making in prenatal genetic counseling. Warton C; Johnston M; Mills C J Genet Couns; 2023 Jun; 32(3):576-583. PubMed ID: 36765016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of counselee and counselor satisfaction in reproductive genetic counseling. Aalfs CM; Oort FJ; de Haes JC; Leschot NJ; Smets EM Clin Genet; 2007 Aug; 72(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 17661810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project. Suckiel SA; Linderman MD; Sanderson SC; Diaz GA; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE; Zinberg RE J Genet Couns; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1044-53. PubMed ID: 26898680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwives' perceptions of communication during videotaped counseling for prenatal anomaly tests: how do they relate to clients' perceptions and independent observations? Martin L; Gitsels-van der Wal JT; Pereboom MT; Spelten ER; Hutton EK; van Dulmen S Patient Educ Couns; 2015 May; 98(5):588-97. PubMed ID: 25727285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]