407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26234650)
1. Prostate Cancer on the Web-Expedient Tool for Patients' Decision-Making?
Borgmann H; Wölm JH; Vallo S; Mager R; Huber J; Breyer J; Salem J; Loeb S; Haferkamp A; Tsaur I
J Cancer Educ; 2017 Mar; 32(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 26234650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic Prostatectomy on the Web: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative Assessment.
Borgmann H; Mager R; Salem J; Bründl J; Kunath F; Thomas C; Haferkamp A; Tsaur I
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2016 Aug; 14(4):e355-62. PubMed ID: 26821529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.
Joury AU; Alshathri M; Alkhunaizi M; Jaleesah N; Pines JM
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 27341392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Content and Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Patients and Families on Adult Kidney Cancer.
Alsaiari A; Joury A; Aljuaid M; Wazzan M; Pines JM
J Cancer Educ; 2017 Dec; 32(4):878-884. PubMed ID: 27130549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.
Grewal P; Alagaratnam S
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the quality of patient-oriented information over internet on testicular cancer.
Prasanth AS; Jayarajah U; Mohanappirian R; Seneviratne SA
BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):491. PubMed ID: 29716564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Internet Information on Meningiomas.
Saeed F; Anderson I
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 97():312-316. PubMed ID: 27742505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.
Halboub E; Al-Ak'hali MS; Al-Mekhlafi HM; Alhajj MN
BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33461516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the quality and readability of online information on keratoconus treatment.
Panthagani J; Hamze H; Riaz A; Moussa G
Can J Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 58(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 34678173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variable Quality and Readability of Patient-oriented Websites on Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MC; Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):79-85.e3. PubMed ID: 27404964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of websites that contain information relating to malaria in pregnancy.
Hamwela V; Ahmed W; Bath PA
Public Health; 2018 Apr; 157():50-52. PubMed ID: 29477789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Websites on Bladder Cancer: an Appropriate Source of Patient Information?
Salem J; Paffenholz P; Bolenz C; von Brandenstein M; Cebulla A; Haferkamp A; Kuru T; Lee CT; Pfister D; Tsaur I; Borgmann H; Heidenreich A
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Apr; 34(2):381-387. PubMed ID: 29313299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Availability of accessible and high-quality information on the Internet for patients regarding the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears.
Dalton DM; Kelly EG; Molony DC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 May; 24(5):e135-40. PubMed ID: 25457189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
