These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26234650)

  • 1. Prostate Cancer on the Web-Expedient Tool for Patients' Decision-Making?
    Borgmann H; Wölm JH; Vallo S; Mager R; Huber J; Breyer J; Salem J; Loeb S; Haferkamp A; Tsaur I
    J Cancer Educ; 2017 Mar; 32(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 26234650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic Prostatectomy on the Web: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative Assessment.
    Borgmann H; Mager R; Salem J; Bründl J; Kunath F; Thomas C; Haferkamp A; Tsaur I
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2016 Aug; 14(4):e355-62. PubMed ID: 26821529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.
    Joury AU; Alshathri M; Alkhunaizi M; Jaleesah N; Pines JM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 27341392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Content and Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Patients and Families on Adult Kidney Cancer.
    Alsaiari A; Joury A; Aljuaid M; Wazzan M; Pines JM
    J Cancer Educ; 2017 Dec; 32(4):878-884. PubMed ID: 27130549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.
    Grewal P; Alagaratnam S
    Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the quality of patient-oriented information over internet on testicular cancer.
    Prasanth AS; Jayarajah U; Mohanappirian R; Seneviratne SA
    BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):491. PubMed ID: 29716564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
    Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Internet Information on Meningiomas.
    Saeed F; Anderson I
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 97():312-316. PubMed ID: 27742505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
    Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.
    Halboub E; Al-Ak'hali MS; Al-Mekhlafi HM; Alhajj MN
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33461516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the quality and readability of online information on keratoconus treatment.
    Panthagani J; Hamze H; Riaz A; Moussa G
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 58(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 34678173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variable Quality and Readability of Patient-oriented Websites on Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MC; Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):79-85.e3. PubMed ID: 27404964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of websites that contain information relating to malaria in pregnancy.
    Hamwela V; Ahmed W; Bath PA
    Public Health; 2018 Apr; 157():50-52. PubMed ID: 29477789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
    Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
    BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Websites on Bladder Cancer: an Appropriate Source of Patient Information?
    Salem J; Paffenholz P; Bolenz C; von Brandenstein M; Cebulla A; Haferkamp A; Kuru T; Lee CT; Pfister D; Tsaur I; Borgmann H; Heidenreich A
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Apr; 34(2):381-387. PubMed ID: 29313299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Availability of accessible and high-quality information on the Internet for patients regarding the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears.
    Dalton DM; Kelly EG; Molony DC
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 May; 24(5):e135-40. PubMed ID: 25457189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.