These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26234650)

  • 21. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the Quality of Printed Online Education Materials in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery.
    Alwani MM; Campiti VJ; Bandali EH; Nesemeier BR; Ting JY; Shipchandler TZ
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2020; 22(4):255-261. PubMed ID: 32267787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Your patient information website: how good is it?
    Soobrah R; Clark SK
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Mar; 14(3):e90-4. PubMed ID: 21883807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
    Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
    Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
    Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hidradenitis suppurativa gains increasing interest on World Wide Web: a source for patient information?
    Hessam S; Salem J; Bechara FG; Haferkamp A; Heidenreich A; Paffenholz P; Sand M; Tsaur I; Borgmann H
    Int J Dermatol; 2017 Jul; 56(7):726-732. PubMed ID: 28321845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis.
    Jo JH; Kim EJ; Kim JR; Kim MJ; Chung JW; Park JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Mar; 125(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 29325852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
    Aboalshamat K
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device.
    Rouhi AD; Han JJ; Ghanem YK; Pervaiz SS; Suarez-Pierre A; Choudhury RA; Bermudez CA; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36478254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
    Özduran E; Hanci V
    Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploring the most visible websites on cutaneous T-cell lymphoma-revealing limited quality of patient health information on the internet.
    Özistanbullu D; Weber R; Kleemann J; Jäger M; Kippenberger S; Kaufmann R; Meissner M
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):2008-2015. PubMed ID: 35842932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines.
    Raj S; Sharma VL; Singh AJ; Goel S
    Adv Prev Med; 2016; 2016():4815285. PubMed ID: 27119025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
    Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
    Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality of the patient-oriented web-based information on esophageal cancer.
    Jayasinghe R; Ranasinghe S; Jayarajah U; Seneviratne S
    J Cancer Educ; 2022 Jun; 37(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 32803566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cochlear implantation: An assessment of quality and readability of web-based information aimed at patients.
    Seymour N; Lakhani R; Hartley B; Cochrane L; Jephson C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):321-5. PubMed ID: 26154560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
    Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
    Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of quality and readability of internet-based health information related to commonly prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers.
    Oloidi A; Nduaguba SO; Obamiro K
    Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 35():70. PubMed ID: 32537073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.