These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
939 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26234823)
1. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen. Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality. Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v. Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions. Goodenberger MH; Wagner-Bartak NA; Gupta S; Liu X; Yap RQ; Sun J; Tamm EP; Jensen CT J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 28806318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection. Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of noise reduction potential and image quality improvement of a new generation adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in chest CT. Tang H; Yu N; Jia Y; Yu Y; Duan H; Han D; Ma G; Ren C; He T Br J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 91(1081):20170521. PubMed ID: 29076347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography. Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients. Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Leipsic J; Nguyen G; Brown J; Sin D; Mayo JR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1095-9. PubMed ID: 20966312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative assessment of three image reconstruction techniques for image quality and radiation dose in patients undergoing abdominopelvic multidetector CT examinations. Desai GS; Thabet A; Elias AY; Sahani DV Br J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 86(1021):20120161. PubMed ID: 23255538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Application of a New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Upper Abdominal CT. Jia Y; Zhai B; He T; Yu Y; Yu N; Duan H; Yang C; Zhang X Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):e275-e283. PubMed ID: 30660470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V Versus Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction: Impact on Dose Reduction and Image Quality in Body Computed Tomography. Gatti M; Marchisio F; Fronda M; Rampado O; Faletti R; Bergamasco L; Ropolo R; Fonio P J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 28937493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]