BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26235208)

  • 1. Comparison of Glioblastomas and Brain Metastases using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI.
    Jung BC; Arevalo-Perez J; Lyo JK; Holodny AI; Karimi S; Young RJ; Peck KK
    J Neuroimaging; 2016; 26(2):240-6. PubMed ID: 26235208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiation between glioblastomas and brain metastases and regarding their primary site of malignancy using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI at 3T.
    Askaner K; Rydelius A; Engelholm S; Knutsson L; Lätt J; Abul-Kasim K; Sundgren PC
    J Neuroradiol; 2019 Nov; 46(6):367-372. PubMed ID: 30389510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tumor-related Perfusion Changes in White Matter Adjacent to Brain Tumors: Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Dynamic 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Tupý R; Mírka H; Mraček J; Přibáň V; Hes O; Vokurka S; Ferda J
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Jul; 38(7):4149-4152. PubMed ID: 29970543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical parameters outweigh diffusion- and perfusion-derived MRI parameters in predicting survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
    Burth S; Kickingereder P; Eidel O; Tichy D; Bonekamp D; Weberling L; Wick A; Löw S; Hertenstein A; Nowosielski M; Schlemmer HP; Wick W; Bendszus M; Radbruch A
    Neuro Oncol; 2016 Dec; 18(12):1673-1679. PubMed ID: 27298312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uninterpretable Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Images in Patients with Post-Treatment Glioblastomas: Cross-Validation of Alternative Imaging Options.
    Heo YJ; Kim HS; Park JE; Choi CG; Kim SJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136380. PubMed ID: 26296086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between perfusion computed tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in assessing glioblastoma microvasculature.
    Jia ZZ; Shi W; Shi JL; Shen DD; Gu HM; Zhou XJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Feb; 87():120-124. PubMed ID: 28034567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating glioblastoma, primary central nervous system lymphoma and brain metastatic tumor.
    Lu S; Gao Q; Yu J; Li Y; Cao P; Shi H; Hong X
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1722-1727. PubMed ID: 27666608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion for differentiating between melanoma and lung cancer brain metastases.
    Hatzoglou V; Tisnado J; Mehta A; Peck KK; Daras M; Omuro AM; Beal K; Holodny AI
    Cancer Med; 2017 Apr; 6(4):761-767. PubMed ID: 28303695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which combination of MR imaging modalities is best for predicting recurrent glioblastoma? Study of diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility.
    Kim HS; Goh MJ; Kim N; Choi CG; Kim SJ; Kim JH
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):831-43. PubMed ID: 24885857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contrast enhanced T1 MRI perfusion differentiates pseudoprogression from recurrent glioblastoma.
    Thomas AA; Arevalo-Perez J; Kaley T; Lyo J; Peck KK; Shi W; Zhang Z; Young RJ
    J Neurooncol; 2015 Oct; 125(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 26275367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies Glioblastoma Immunohistochemical Biomarkers via Tumoral and Peritumoral Approach: A Pilot Study.
    Ozturk K; Soylu E; Tolunay S; Narter S; Hakyemez B
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e195-e208. PubMed ID: 31003026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentiation between glioblastoma, brain metastasis and subtypes using radiomics analysis.
    Artzi M; Bressler I; Ben Bashat D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 30635952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI: Comparison of intraindividually matched T1 - and T2 (*) -based bolus techniques.
    Bonekamp D; Deike K; Wiestler B; Wick W; Bendszus M; Radbruch A; Heiland S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 25244574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-resolution blood-pool-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in glioblastoma: tumor-associated neovascularization as a biomarker for patient survival. A preliminary study.
    Puig J; Blasco G; Daunis-I-Estadella J; Alberich-Bayarri A; Essig M; Jain R; Remollo S; Hernández D; Puigdemont M; Sánchez-González J; Mateu G; Wintermark M; Pedraza S
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Jan; 58(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26438560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognosis prediction of non-enhancing T2 high signal intensity lesions in glioblastoma patients after standard treatment: application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Kim R; Choi SH; Yun TJ; Lee ST; Park CK; Kim TM; Kim JH; Park SW; Sohn CH; Park SH; Kim IH
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1176-1185. PubMed ID: 27357131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging pharmacokinetic parameters as predictors of treatment response of brain metastases in patients with lung cancer.
    Kuchcinski G; Le Rhun E; Cortot AB; Drumez E; Duhal R; Lalisse M; Dumont J; Lopes R; Pruvo JP; Leclerc X; Delmaire C
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3733-3743. PubMed ID: 28210799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of survival and progression in glioblastoma patients using temporal perfusion changes during radiochemotherapy.
    Larsson C; Groote I; Vardal J; Kleppestø M; Odland A; Brandal P; Due-Tønnessen P; Holme SS; Hope TR; Meling TR; Fosse E; Emblem KE; Bjørnerud A
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():106-112. PubMed ID: 32004711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiation of brain abscesses from glioblastomas and metastatic brain tumors: comparisons of diagnostic performance of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging before and after mathematic contrast leakage correction.
    Toh CH; Wei KC; Chang CN; Ng SH; Wong HF; Lin CP
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109172. PubMed ID: 25330386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging of Primary Brain Tumors and Metastases with Fast Quantitative 3-Dimensional Magnetization Transfer.
    Garcia M; Gloor M; Bieri O; Radue EW; Lieb JM; Cordier D; Stippich C
    J Neuroimaging; 2015; 25(6):1007-14. PubMed ID: 25702714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in predicting progression of enhancing lesions persisting after standard treatment in glioblastoma patients: a prospective study.
    Yoo RE; Choi SH; Kim TM; Park CK; Park SH; Won JK; Kim IH; Lee ST; Choi HJ; You SH; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3156-3166. PubMed ID: 27975145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.