294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26235790)
41. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.
Levy Y; Zadok D; Glovinsky Y; Krakowski D; Nemet P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Apr; 25(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 10198852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Agreement and reproducibility of Tono-Pen XL tip covered with ocufilm and fingertip of surgical glove in intra-ocular pressure measurement.
Sayawat N; Duangnumsawang D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Apr; 95 Suppl 4():S102-6. PubMed ID: 22696861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.
Tonnu PA; Ho T; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the tono-pen, goldmann applanation tonometer, and noncontact tonometer in nonglaucomatous pseudophakic children.
Oskan Yalcın S; Kaplan AT
Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; 44(1):285. PubMed ID: 38935310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of corneal stiffening on Goldmann applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen measurements in canine eyes.
Tang J; Pan X; Weber PA; Liu J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1397-405. PubMed ID: 22297494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Tonometry in pediatric patients: a comparative study among Tono-pen, Perkins, and Schiötz tonometers.
Bordon AF; Katsumi O; Hirose T
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1995; 32(6):373-7. PubMed ID: 8587021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparative Evaluation of Rebound and Perkins Tonometers in Pediatric Glaucoma With Varied Corneal Characteristics.
Angmo D; Ramesh P; Mahalingam K; Azmira K; Pandey S; Gupta V; Sihota R; Dada T
J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr; 30(4):312-316. PubMed ID: 33399355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers.
De Bernardo M; Abbinante G; Borrelli M; Di Stasi M; Cione F; Rosa N
J Clin Med; 2022 Oct; 11(21):. PubMed ID: 36362460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Icare ONE Home Tonometry in Children With and Without Known Glaucoma.
Gandhi NG; Jones SK; Freedman SF
J Glaucoma; 2016 Feb; 25(2):e66-9. PubMed ID: 25943728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Development and validation of a machine learning, smartphone-based tonometer.
Wu Y; Luttrell I; Feng S; Chen PP; Spaide T; Lee AY; Wen JC
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 104(10):1394-1398. PubMed ID: 31871048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A Comparative Study of Rebound Tonometry With Tonopen and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Following Vitreoretinal Surgery.
Grewal DS; Stinnett SS; Folgar FA; Schneider EW; Vajzovic L; Asrani S; Freedman SF; Mruthyunjaya P; Hahn P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():22-8.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26408266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of Three Different Tonometers in Eyes with Angle Closure.
Lee TE; Yoo C; Kim YY
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Feb; 96(2):124-129. PubMed ID: 30589761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of the Tono-Pen 2 and the X-Pert noncontact tonometers in cataract surgery.
Denis P; Nordmann JP; Bertin V; Gayraud JM; Laroche L; Saraux H
Ophthalmologica; 1993; 207(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 8278182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Validation of the Icare
Gloe S; Rothering A; Kiland JA; McLellan GJ
Exp Eye Res; 2019 Aug; 185():107698. PubMed ID: 31201805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of IOP Measurement by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare Rebound Tonometer, and Tono-Pen in Keratoconus Patients after MyoRing Implantation.
Rateb M; Abdel-Radi M; Eldaly Z; Elmohamady MN; Noor El Din A
J Ophthalmol; 2019; 2019():1964107. PubMed ID: 31210982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Tono-Pen determination of intraocular pressure in patients with band keratopathy or glued cornea.
Azuara-Blanco A; Bhojani TK; Sarhan AR; Pillai CT; Dua HS
Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 82(6):634-6. PubMed ID: 9797663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Validation and comparison of four handheld tonometers in normal ex vivo canine eyes.
Minella AL; Kiland JA; Gloe S; McLellan GJ
Vet Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):162-170. PubMed ID: 32478941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Perkins applanation tonometer in children under general anesthesia.
Chagny M; Stolowy N; Denis D; Sauvan L
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2023 Nov; 46(9):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 37210292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Tono-Pen tonometer and corneal thickness.
Mok KH; Wong CS; Lee VW
Eye (Lond); 1999; 13 ( Pt 1)():35-7. PubMed ID: 10396381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessment of intraocular pressure in vitrectomized gas-containing eyes. A clinical and manometric comparison of the Tono-Pen to the pneumotonometer.
Lim JI; Blair NP; Higginbotham EJ; Farber MD; Shaw WE; Garretson BR
Arch Ophthalmol; 1990 May; 108(5):684-8. PubMed ID: 2334326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
