These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26236267)

  • 1. The path of ambivalence: tracing the pull of opposing evaluations using mouse trajectories.
    Schneider IK; van Harreveld F; Rotteveel M; Topolinski S; van der Pligt J; Schwarz N; Koole SL
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():996. PubMed ID: 26236267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Let's not be indifferent about robots: Neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots.
    Stapels JG; Eyssel F
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244697. PubMed ID: 33439891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating attitudinal ambivalence via sequential priming: Evidence for the simultaneous and unintentional activation of opposite evaluations.
    Berger KT; Hütter M; Corneille O
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jul; 148(7):1269-1297. PubMed ID: 30802095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feeling torn when everything seems right: semantic incongruence causes felt ambivalence.
    Gebauer JE; Maio GR; Pakizeh A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jun; 39(6):777-91. PubMed ID: 23512319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: introducing the MAID model.
    van Harreveld F; van der Pligt J; de Liver YN
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Feb; 13(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 19144904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robocalypse? Yes, Please! The Role of Robot Autonomy in the Development of Ambivalent Attitudes Towards Robots.
    Stapels JG; Eyssel F
    Int J Soc Robot; 2022; 14(3):683-697. PubMed ID: 34413912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors and predictive effects of ambivalence.
    Sparks P; Harris PR; Lockwood N
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2004 Sep; 43(Pt 3):371-83. PubMed ID: 15479536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ambivalence and Interpersonal Liking: The Expression of Ambivalence as Social Validation of Attitudinal Conflict.
    Toribio-Flórez D; van Harreveld F; Schneider IK
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():525301. PubMed ID: 33132947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Structuralistic and meta-psychological approaches to ambivalence in schizophrenia].
    Sumida K; Tsuda H
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2003; 105(8):1037-44. PubMed ID: 14577287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural dissociations in attitude strength: Distinct regions of cingulate cortex track ambivalence and certainty.
    Luttrell A; Stillman PE; Hasinski AE; Cunningham WA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Apr; 145(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 26854498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal Ambivalence.
    Weng J; DeMarree KG
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():854. PubMed ID: 31068857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive, negative, or all relative? Evaluative conditioning of ambivalence.
    Glaser T; Woud ML; Labib Iskander M; Schmalenstroth V; Vo TM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():155-165. PubMed ID: 29482089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of dialecticism in objective and subjective attitudinal ambivalence.
    Luttrell A; Petty RE; Chang JH; Togans LJ
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2022 Jul; 61(3):826-841. PubMed ID: 34724231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ambivalence about health-related behaviours: an exploration in the domain of food choice.
    Sparks P; Conner M; James R; Shepherd R; Povey R
    Br J Health Psychol; 2001 Feb; 6(Pt 1):53-68. PubMed ID: 14596738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does co-occurrence information influence evaluations beyond relational meaning? An investigation using self-reported and mouse-tracking measures of attitudinal ambivalence.
    Béna J; Mauclet A; Corneille O
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Apr; 152(4):968-992. PubMed ID: 36301271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Attitude formation: experienced ambivalence, subjective difficulty and response latency in evaluatively inconsistent, consistent and neutral information].
    Brömer P
    Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 10829615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ambivalence toward healthy and unhealthy food and moderation by individual differences in restrained eating.
    Norris CJ; Do E; Close E; Deswert S
    Appetite; 2019 Sep; 140():309-317. PubMed ID: 31136805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits of being ambivalent: The relationship between trait ambivalence and attribution biases.
    Schneider IK; Novin S; van Harreveld F; Genschow O
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2021 Apr; 60(2):570-586. PubMed ID: 32893893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Social Utility of Ambivalence: Being Ambivalent on Controversial Issues Is Recognized as Competence.
    Pillaud V; Cavazza N; Butera F
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():961. PubMed ID: 29988468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feeling conflicted and seeking information: when ambivalence enhances and diminishes selective exposure to attitude-consistent information.
    Sawicki V; Wegener DT; Clark JK; Fabrigar LR; Smith SM; Durso GR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jun; 39(6):735-47. PubMed ID: 23482502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.