These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26236890)

  • 1. Everybody loses: intraspecific competition induces tragedy of the commons in Allenby's gerbils.
    Berger-Tal O; Embar K; Kotler BP; Saltz D
    Ecology; 2015 Jan; 96(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 26236890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does intraspecific competition among Allenby's gerbils lead to an Ideal Free Distribution across foraging patches?
    Makin DF; Kotler BP
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103922. PubMed ID: 31377380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driven to distraction: detecting the hidden costs of flea parasitism through foraging behaviour in gerbils.
    Raveh A; Kotler BP; Abramsky Z; Krasnov BR
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Jan; 14(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21070560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Enemy Within: How Does a Bacterium Inhibit the Foraging Aptitude and Risk Management Behavior of Allenby's Gerbils?
    Makin DF; Kotler BP; Brown JS; Garrido M; Menezes JFS
    Am Nat; 2020 Dec; 196(6):717-729. PubMed ID: 33211558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State of emergency: behavior of gerbils is affected by the hunger state of their predators.
    Berger-Tal O; Kotler BP
    Ecology; 2010 Feb; 91(2):593-600. PubMed ID: 20392023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-specific competitors reduce inter-gender competition in Negev Desert gerbils.
    Ovadia O; Abramsky Z; Kotler BP; Pinshow B
    Oecologia; 2005 Jan; 142(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 15655694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging.
    Kotler BP; Brown J; Mukherjee S; Berger-Tal O; Bouskila A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 May; 277(1687):1469-74. PubMed ID: 20053649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defense by exploitation in Negev gerbils.
    Menezes JFS; Kotler BP; Dixon AK
    Behav Processes; 2019 May; 162():97-103. PubMed ID: 30716385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complex state-dependent games between owls and gerbils.
    Berger-Tal O; Mukherjee S; Kotler BP; Brown JS
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Mar; 13(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 20455918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To dare or not to dare? Risk management by owls in a predator-prey foraging game.
    Embar K; Raveh A; Burns D; Kotler BP
    Oecologia; 2014 Jul; 175(3):825-34. PubMed ID: 24810326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resolving the tragedy of the commons: the feedback between intraspecific conflict and population density.
    Rankin DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):173-80. PubMed ID: 17210010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision-making by bushveld gerbils (Gerbilliscus leucogaster).
    Rymer TL; Cruise M; Pillay N
    J Comp Psychol; 2021 May; 135(2):244-257. PubMed ID: 33332138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum.
    Abramsky Z; Strauss E; Subach A; Riechman A; Kotler BP
    Oecologia; 1996 Feb; 105(3):313-319. PubMed ID: 28307103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety in numbers: sophisticated vigilance by Allenby's gerbil.
    Rosenzweig ML; Abramsky Z; Subach A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 May; 94(11):5713-5. PubMed ID: 9159138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food.
    Charalabidis A; Dechaume-Moncharmont FX; Petit S; Bohan DA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187167. PubMed ID: 29121652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of individual foraging specialization in large marine vertebrates, the Antarctic and subantarctic fur seals.
    Kernaléguen L; Arnould JP; Guinet C; Cherel Y
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jul; 84(4):1081-91. PubMed ID: 25649011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Costs and benefits of within-group spatial position: a feeding competition model.
    Hirsch BT
    Q Rev Biol; 2007 Mar; 82(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 17354992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The foraging behavior of the central mudminnow and yellow perch: the influence of foraging site, intraspecific and interspecific competition.
    Paszkowski CA
    Oecologia; 1985 May; 66(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 28311600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the magnitude of intra- and interspecific competition in two coral reef fishes.
    Forrester GE; Evans B; Steele MA; Vance RR
    Oecologia; 2006 Jul; 148(4):632-40. PubMed ID: 16518631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ninja owl; Gerbils over-anticipate an unexpected flying predator.
    Bleicher SS; Kotler BP; Embar K
    Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104161. PubMed ID: 32505484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.