BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26236890)

  • 1. Everybody loses: intraspecific competition induces tragedy of the commons in Allenby's gerbils.
    Berger-Tal O; Embar K; Kotler BP; Saltz D
    Ecology; 2015 Jan; 96(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 26236890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does intraspecific competition among Allenby's gerbils lead to an Ideal Free Distribution across foraging patches?
    Makin DF; Kotler BP
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103922. PubMed ID: 31377380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driven to distraction: detecting the hidden costs of flea parasitism through foraging behaviour in gerbils.
    Raveh A; Kotler BP; Abramsky Z; Krasnov BR
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Jan; 14(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21070560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Enemy Within: How Does a Bacterium Inhibit the Foraging Aptitude and Risk Management Behavior of Allenby's Gerbils?
    Makin DF; Kotler BP; Brown JS; Garrido M; Menezes JFS
    Am Nat; 2020 Dec; 196(6):717-729. PubMed ID: 33211558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State of emergency: behavior of gerbils is affected by the hunger state of their predators.
    Berger-Tal O; Kotler BP
    Ecology; 2010 Feb; 91(2):593-600. PubMed ID: 20392023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-specific competitors reduce inter-gender competition in Negev Desert gerbils.
    Ovadia O; Abramsky Z; Kotler BP; Pinshow B
    Oecologia; 2005 Jan; 142(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 15655694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging.
    Kotler BP; Brown J; Mukherjee S; Berger-Tal O; Bouskila A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 May; 277(1687):1469-74. PubMed ID: 20053649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defense by exploitation in Negev gerbils.
    Menezes JFS; Kotler BP; Dixon AK
    Behav Processes; 2019 May; 162():97-103. PubMed ID: 30716385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complex state-dependent games between owls and gerbils.
    Berger-Tal O; Mukherjee S; Kotler BP; Brown JS
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Mar; 13(3):302-10. PubMed ID: 20455918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To dare or not to dare? Risk management by owls in a predator-prey foraging game.
    Embar K; Raveh A; Burns D; Kotler BP
    Oecologia; 2014 Jul; 175(3):825-34. PubMed ID: 24810326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resolving the tragedy of the commons: the feedback between intraspecific conflict and population density.
    Rankin DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):173-80. PubMed ID: 17210010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision-making by bushveld gerbils (Gerbilliscus leucogaster).
    Rymer TL; Cruise M; Pillay N
    J Comp Psychol; 2021 May; 135(2):244-257. PubMed ID: 33332138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum.
    Abramsky Z; Strauss E; Subach A; Riechman A; Kotler BP
    Oecologia; 1996 Feb; 105(3):313-319. PubMed ID: 28307103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety in numbers: sophisticated vigilance by Allenby's gerbil.
    Rosenzweig ML; Abramsky Z; Subach A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 May; 94(11):5713-5. PubMed ID: 9159138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food.
    Charalabidis A; Dechaume-Moncharmont FX; Petit S; Bohan DA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187167. PubMed ID: 29121652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of individual foraging specialization in large marine vertebrates, the Antarctic and subantarctic fur seals.
    Kernaléguen L; Arnould JP; Guinet C; Cherel Y
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jul; 84(4):1081-91. PubMed ID: 25649011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Costs and benefits of within-group spatial position: a feeding competition model.
    Hirsch BT
    Q Rev Biol; 2007 Mar; 82(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 17354992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The foraging behavior of the central mudminnow and yellow perch: the influence of foraging site, intraspecific and interspecific competition.
    Paszkowski CA
    Oecologia; 1985 May; 66(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 28311600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the magnitude of intra- and interspecific competition in two coral reef fishes.
    Forrester GE; Evans B; Steele MA; Vance RR
    Oecologia; 2006 Jul; 148(4):632-40. PubMed ID: 16518631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ninja owl; Gerbils over-anticipate an unexpected flying predator.
    Bleicher SS; Kotler BP; Embar K
    Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104161. PubMed ID: 32505484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.