These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26236890)

  • 41. Optimal foraging strategies for mutually avoiding competitors.
    Golnaraghi F; Quint DA; Gopinathan A
    J Theor Biol; 2023 Aug; 570():111537. PubMed ID: 37207720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Intraguild predation and competition impacts on a subordinate predator.
    Björklund H; Santangeli A; Blanchet FG; Huitu O; Lehtoranta H; Lindén H; Valkama J; Laaksonen T
    Oecologia; 2016 May; 181(1):257-69. PubMed ID: 26841931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Coexistence of three specialist aphids on common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca.
    Smith RA; Mooney KA; Agrawal AA
    Ecology; 2008 Aug; 89(8):2187-96. PubMed ID: 18724729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Competition versus cooperation: success of individuals foraging alone and in groups.
    Ranta E; Rita H; Lindstrom K
    Am Nat; 1993 Jul; 142(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 19425970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Intraspecific Competition and Inbreeding Depression: Increased Competitive Effort by Inbred Males Is Costly to Outbred Opponents.
    Richardson J; Smiseth PT
    Am Nat; 2017 May; 189(5):539-548. PubMed ID: 28410022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Vigilance and fitness in grey partridges Perdix perdix: the effects of group size and foraging-vigilance trade-offs on predation mortality.
    Watson M; Aebischer NJ; Cresswell W
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Mar; 76(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17302828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Do intraspecific or interspecific interactions determine responses to predators feeding on a shared size-structured prey community?
    ten Brink H; Mazumdar AK; Huddart J; Persson L; Cameron TC
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):414-26. PubMed ID: 25314614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Biotic interactions govern genetic adaptation to toxicants.
    Becker JM; Liess M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 May; 282(1806):20150071. PubMed ID: 25833856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interaction between stress induced by competition, predation, and an insecticide on the response of aquatic invertebrates.
    Van den Brink PJ; Klein SL; Rico A
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Sep; 36(9):2485-2492. PubMed ID: 28295548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of competition on the strength and softness of selection.
    Ho EK; Agrawal AF
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2537-46. PubMed ID: 23020134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Multi-clone infections and the impact of intraspecific competition on trematode colonies with a division of labour.
    Lloyd MM; Poulin R
    Parasitology; 2014 Feb; 141(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 24148647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Density of an intraguild predator mediates feeding group size, intraguild egg predation, and intra- and interspecific competition.
    Burley LA; Moyer AT; Petranka JW
    Oecologia; 2006 Jul; 148(4):641-9. PubMed ID: 16514532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cheek pouch use, predation risk, and feeding competition in blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni).
    Smith LW; Link A; Cords M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2008 Nov; 137(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 18613091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Coexistence of annual plants: generalist seed predation weakens the storage effect.
    Kuang JJ; Chesson P
    Ecology; 2009 Jan; 90(1):170-82. PubMed ID: 19294923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population.
    Svanbäck R; Bolnick DI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 274(1611):839-44. PubMed ID: 17251094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Integrating the roles of information and competitive ability on the spatial distribution of social foragers.
    Koops MA; Abrahams MV
    Am Nat; 2003 Apr; 161(4):586-600. PubMed ID: 12776886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Climate-driven sympatry may not lead to foraging competition between congeneric top-predators.
    Cimino MA; Moline MA; Fraser WR; Patterson-Fraser DL; Oliver MJ
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():18820. PubMed ID: 26732496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Optimization, conflict, and nonoverlapping foraging ranges in ants.
    Adler FR; Gordon DM
    Am Nat; 2003 Nov; 162(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 14618533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Lead effects on food competition and predatory aggression in Binghamton HET mice.
    Hahn ME; Burright RG; Donovick PJ
    Physiol Behav; 1991 Oct; 50(4):757-64. PubMed ID: 1775550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Larval competition of Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae): behavior and ecological studies of two blow fly species of forensic significance.
    Shiao SF; Yeh TC
    J Med Entomol; 2008 Jul; 45(4):785-99. PubMed ID: 18714884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.