These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2623712)

  • 1. [Clinical evaluation of amalgam restorations for Class I cavities and Class II. Part II: Cause analysis of unacceptable restorations].
    Weiland M; Nossek H; Schulz P
    Stomatol DDR; 1989 Jan; 39(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 2623712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical evaluation of the amalagam restorations for cavities Class I and Class II. 3: Comparison between dental school and dental institutions in the community].
    Weiland M; Nossek H; Schulz P
    Stomatol DDR; 1990 Apr; 40(4):155-6. PubMed ID: 2270563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical evaluation of the amalgam restorations for Class I and Class II cavities. I: Influence of localization, size, age and polishing of fillings as well as patient age and oral hygiene on the quality of restorations].
    Weiland M; Nossek H; Schulz P
    Stomatol DDR; 1988 Dec; 38(12):801-5. PubMed ID: 3253982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The safe and effective use of dental amalgam.
    Mjör IA
    Int Dent J; 1987 Sep; 37(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 3316042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinically controlled experiment on frequency of secondary caries in amalgam and mold fillings].
    Jahn KR; Hansche C; Zuhrt R
    Stomatol DDR; 1989 Apr; 39(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 2696150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations.
    Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):228-32. PubMed ID: 9028243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A controlled clinical study of amalgam restorations: survival, failures, and causes of failure.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ
    Dent Mater; 1989 Mar; 5(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 2606273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.