436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26238120)
1. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examining the effects of an eco-driving message on driver distraction.
Rouzikhah H; King M; Rakotonirainy A
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():975-83. PubMed ID: 22910188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluctuating attentional demand in a simulated driving assessment: the roles of age and driving complexity.
Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Zhang JJ; Montembeault P; Bedard M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 22133333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reading text while driving: understanding drivers' strategic and tactical adaptation to distraction.
Liang Y; Horrey WJ; Hoffman JD
Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 25850162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An investigation of driver distraction near the tipping point of traffic flow stability.
Cooper JM; Vladisavljevic I; Medeiros-Ward N; Martin PT; Strayer DL
Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 19653488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions.
Brooks JO; Crisler MC; Klein N; Goodenough R; Beeco RW; Guirl C; Tyler PJ; Hilpert A; Miller Y; Grygier J; Burroughs B; Martin A; Ray R; Palmer C; Beck C
Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):698-705. PubMed ID: 21376857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Task-Difficulty Homeostasis in Car Following Models: Experimental Validation Using Self-Paced Visual Occlusion.
Pekkanen J; Lappi O; Itkonen TH; Summala H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169704. PubMed ID: 28085901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment.
Galante F; Mauriello F; Montella A; Pernetti M; Aria M; D'Ambrosio A
Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 20728607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attentional Demand as a Function of Contextual Factors in Different Traffic Scenarios.
Liu Z; Ahlström C; Forsman Å; Kircher K
Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1171-1189. PubMed ID: 31424969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Driving speed of young novice and experienced drivers in simulated hazard anticipation scenes.
Parmet Y; Borowsky A; Yona O; Oron-Gilad T
Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):311-28. PubMed ID: 25850160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity of the lane change test as a measure of in-vehicle system demand.
Young KL; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):611-8. PubMed ID: 20828672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk and safety perception on urban and rural roads: Effects of environmental features, driver age and risk sensitivity.
Cox JA; Beanland V; Filtness AJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Oct; 18(7):703-710. PubMed ID: 28436735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of headway distance and car speed on drivers' decisions to answer an incoming call.
Pouyakian M; Mahabadi HA; Yazdi SM; Hajizadeh E; Nahvi A
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 23944976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.
Solís-Marcos I; Ahlström C; Kircher K
Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):778-792. PubMed ID: 29791201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chinese carless young drivers' self-reported driving behavior and simulated driving performance.
Zhang Q; Jiang Z; Zheng D; Man D; Xu X
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(8):853-60. PubMed ID: 24073774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Older driver distraction: a naturalistic study of behaviour at intersections.
Charlton JL; Catchlove M; Scully M; Koppel S; Newstead S
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():271-8. PubMed ID: 23332726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring individual differences in driver inattention: further validation of the attention-related driving errors scale.
Ledesma RD; Montes SA; Poó FM; López-Ramón MF
Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 25850151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
