These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26238120)

  • 21. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Practical issues in the application of occlusion to measure visual demands imposed on drivers by in-vehicle tasks.
    Brook-Carter N; Stevens A; Reed N; Thompson S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 18651286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How does a lower predictability of lane changes affect performance in the Lane Change Task?
    Petzoldt T; Krems JF
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):1218-24. PubMed ID: 24636727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An investigation of perceived vehicle speed from a driver's perspective.
    Wu C; Yu D; Doherty A; Zhang T; Kust L; Luo G
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185347. PubMed ID: 29040302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gap acceptance and risk-taking by young and mature drivers, both sober and alcohol-intoxicated, in a simulated driving task.
    Leung S; Starmer G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Nov; 37(6):1056-65. PubMed ID: 16036208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.
    Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashes.
    McDonald CC; Curry AE; Kandadai V; Sommers MS; Winston FK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():302-8. PubMed ID: 25103321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of methods for the assessment of attention while driving.
    Kircher K; Ahlstrom C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():40-47. PubMed ID: 28341312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Review of Occlusion as a Tool to Assess Attentional Demand in Driving.
    Kujala T; Kircher K; Ahlström C
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):792-808. PubMed ID: 33908809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The risk of a safety-critical event associated with mobile device use in specific driving contexts.
    Fitch GM; Hanowski RJ; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 24896192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Merging into heavy motorway traffic by young and elderly drivers.
    de Waard D; Dijksterhuis C; Brookhuis KA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 May; 41(3):588-97. PubMed ID: 19393811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces.
    Larsson P; Niemand M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech-based E-mail and driver behavior: effects of an in-vehicle message system interface.
    Jamson AH; Westerman SJ; Hockey GR; Carsten OM
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 15709325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Drivers' Attention Strategies before Eyes-off-Road in Different Traffic Scenarios: Adaptation and Anticipation.
    Liu Z; Yuan W; Ma Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33918239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A field study on the impact of variations in shortterm memory demands on drivers' visual attention and driving performance across three age groups.
    Reimer B; Mehler B; Wang Y; Coughlin JF
    Hum Factors; 2012 Jun; 54(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 22768646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. To call or not to call--that is the question (while driving).
    Tractinsky N; Ram ES; Shinar D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jul; 56():59-70. PubMed ID: 23612559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential.
    Louw T; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 27655754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 28124573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.