311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26238472)
1. Laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis.
Ma B; Huang XZ; Gao P; Zhao JH; Song YX; Sun JX; Chen XW; Wang ZN
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1479-88. PubMed ID: 26238472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction.
Hisada M; Katsumata K; Ishizaki T; Enomoto M; Matsudo T; Kasuya K; Tsuchida A
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 20(44):16707-13. PubMed ID: 25469041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer.
Lin J; Lin S; Chen Z; Zheng B; Lin Y; Zheng Y; Liu Y; Chen SQ
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 Mar; 406(2):283-299. PubMed ID: 32876788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors.
He J; Yao HB; Wang CJ; Yang QY; Qiu JM; Chen JM; Shen Z; Yang GG
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):215. PubMed ID: 32814583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction for carcinoma of sigmoid colon and rectum: a feasible and innovative technique.
Zhang X; Zhou H; Hou H; Hu J; Wang H; Zhou Z
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 48(7):e57-61. PubMed ID: 24440933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has more advantages comparing with laparoscopic-assisted resection for selected patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.
Xingmao Z; Haitao Z; Jianwei L; Huirong H; Junjie H; Zhixiang Z
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1119-24. PubMed ID: 24986143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Propensity score matching-based analysis of short-term outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for left colorectal cancer radical resection].
Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Qiu XF; Yan F; Yuan SS; Cai JC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 May; 96(20):1578-81. PubMed ID: 27266686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) With Oncological Safety: A Prospective and Randomized Trial.
Zhou ZQ; Wang K; Du T; Gao W; Zhu Z; Jiang Q; Ji F; Fu CG
J Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 254():16-22. PubMed ID: 32402832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis of hybrid natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery.
Steinemann DC; Müller PC; Probst P; Schwarz AC; Büchler MW; Müller-Stich BP; Linke GR
Br J Surg; 2017 Jul; 104(8):977-989. PubMed ID: 28608958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic colectomy with or without natural-orifice specimen extraction.
Wolthuis AM; Fieuws S; Van Den Bosch A; de Buck van Overstraeten A; D'Hoore A
Br J Surg; 2015 May; 102(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 25764376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal resection via natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic extraction: a meta-analysis with meta-regression.
Chin YH; Decruz GM; Ng CH; Tan HQM; Lim F; Foo FJ; Tai CH; Chong CS
Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Jan; 25(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 32851500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction-colectomy: a systematic review.
Wolthuis AM; de Buck van Overstraeten A; D'Hoore A
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Sep; 20(36):12981-92. PubMed ID: 25278692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardized laparoscopic NOSE-colectomy is feasible with low morbidity.
Wolthuis AM; de Buck van Overstraeten A; Fieuws S; Boon K; D'Hoore A
Surg Endosc; 2015 May; 29(5):1167-73. PubMed ID: 25149636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new technique of totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for large rectal adenoma.
Zhang XM; Wang Z; Hou HR; Zhou ZX
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Jun; 19(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 25840502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic NOSE Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.
Liu RJ; Zhang CD; Fan YC; Pei JP; Zhang C; Dai DQ
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():597. PubMed ID: 31334119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction during Laparoscopic Bowel Resection for Colorectal Endometriosis: Technique and Outcome.
Bokor A; Lukovich P; Csibi N; D'Hooghe T; Lebovic D; Brubel R; Rigo J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(6):1065-1074. PubMed ID: 29454144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural orifice versus transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis.
Brincat SD; Lauri J; Cini C
BJS Open; 2022 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35640267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic NOSE for sigmoid and rectal cancer.
Xu S; Liu K; Chen X; Yao H
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):222-235. PubMed ID: 33475847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.
Ding Y; Li Z; Gao H; Cao Y; Jin W
J BUON; 2019; 24(5):1817-1823. PubMed ID: 31786842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction colectomy using a Cai tube for left-sided colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial.
Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SB; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Cai JC
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):749-758. PubMed ID: 35906459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
