334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26239233)
1. Better Axial Stiffness of a Bicortical Screw Construct Compared to a Cable Construct for Comminuted Vancouver B1 Proximal Femoral Fractures.
Griffiths JT; Taheri A; Day RE; Yates PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2333-7. PubMed ID: 26239233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison between proximal locking screws and cables.
Graham SM; Mak JH; Moazen M; Leonidou A; Jones AC; Wilcox RK; Tsiridis E
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Sep; 20(5):875-80. PubMed ID: 25968896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.
Hoffmann MF; Burgers TA; Mason JJ; Williams BO; Sietsema DL; Jones CB
Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1035-41. PubMed ID: 24680467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs.
Lochab J; Carrothers A; Wong E; McLachlin S; Aldebeyan W; Jenkinson R; Whyne C; Nousiainen MT
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Jan; 31(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28002219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates.
Gwinner C; Märdian S; Dröge T; Schulze M; Raschke MJ; Stange R
Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1749-55. PubMed ID: 25947899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of different repair methods of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty.
Chen DW; Lin CL; Hu CC; Wu JW; Lee MS
Injury; 2012 Jul; 43(7):1061-5. PubMed ID: 22336128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tangential Bicortical Locked Fixation Improves Stability in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.
Lewis GS; Caroom CT; Wee H; Jurgensmeier D; Rothermel SD; Bramer MA; Reid JS
J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Oct; 29(10):e364-70. PubMed ID: 26053467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Plate fixation in periprosthetic femur fractures Vancouver type B1-Trochanteric hook plate or subtrochanterical bicortical locking?
Lenz M; Stoffel K; Kielstein H; Mayo K; Hofmann GO; Gueorguiev B
Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2800-2804. PubMed ID: 27720182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: A Biomechanical Analysis of Cerclage Fixation.
Frisch NB; Charters MA; Sikora-Klak J; Banglmaier RF; Oravec DJ; Silverton CD
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1449-57. PubMed ID: 25765131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Periprosthetic femoral fracture--a biomechanical comparison between Vancouver type B1 and B2 fixation methods.
Moazen M; Mak JH; Etchels LW; Jin Z; Wilcox RK; Jones AC; Tsiridis E
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):495-500. PubMed ID: 24035619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The biomechanics of plate fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: cables, screws, or both?
Shah S; Kim SY; Dubov A; Schemitsch EH; Bougherara H; Zdero R
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Sep; 225(9):845-56. PubMed ID: 22070022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fixation techniques in Vancouver type AG periprosthetic femoral fracture: a biomechanical study.
Sarıyılmaz K; Korkmaz M; Özkunt O; Gemalmaz HC; Sungur M; Baydoğan M; Kaya İ; Dikici F
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016; 50(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 27130397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone.
Demos HA; Briones MS; White PH; Hogan KA; Barfield WR
J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):783-8. PubMed ID: 22014657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of fixation technique on the stiffness of comminuted Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures.
Choi JK; Gardner TR; Yoon E; Morrison TA; Macaulay WB; Geller JA
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):124-8. PubMed ID: 20558031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical study on proximal plate fixation techniques in periprosthetic femur fractures.
Lenz M; Perren SM; Gueorguiev B; Richards RG; Hofmann GO; Fernandez dell'Oca A; Höntzsch D; Windolf M
Injury; 2014 Jan; 45 Suppl 1():S71-5. PubMed ID: 24252576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal fixation of type-C distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone: surgical technique.
Mückley T; Wähnert D; Hoffmeier KL; von Oldenburg G; Fröber R; Hofmann GO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93 Suppl 1():40-53. PubMed ID: 21411685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral periprosthetic fracture treatment using the Ortho-Bridge System: a biomechanical study.
Long Y; Qi Y; Zuo G; Zhang Q; Liu Z; Wang W
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 17(1):301. PubMed ID: 35659004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Far Cortical Locking Technology in Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Fixation: A Biomechanical Study.
Moazen M; Leonidou A; Pagkalos J; Marghoub A; Fagan MJ; Tsiridis E
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1849-56. PubMed ID: 26989031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semi-rigid screws provide an auxiliary option to plate working length to control interfragmentary movement in locking plate fixation at the distal femur.
Heyland M; Duda GN; Haas NP; Trepczynski A; Döbele S; Höntzsch D; Schaser KD; Märdian S
Injury; 2015 Oct; 46 Suppl 4():S24-32. PubMed ID: 26542863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic refractures following distal femur locking plate fixation.
Alexander J; Morris RP; Kaimrajh D; Milne E; Latta L; Flink A; Lindsey RW
Injury; 2015 Dec; 46(12):2368-73. PubMed ID: 26553428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
