These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26239311)

  • 1. Physician Payment Contracts in the Presence of Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection: The Theory and Its Application in Ontario.
    Kantarevic J; Kralj B
    Health Econ; 2016 Oct; 25(10):1326-40. PubMed ID: 26239311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Introducing Mixed Payment Systems for Physicians: Experimental Evidence.
    Brosig-Koch J; Hennig-Schmidt H; Kairies-Schwarz N; Wiesen D
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26(2):243-262. PubMed ID: 26708170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Link between pay for performance incentives and physician payment mechanisms: evidence from the diabetes management incentive in Ontario.
    Kantarevic J; Kralj B
    Health Econ; 2013 Dec; 22(12):1417-39. PubMed ID: 23203722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stirring the pot: Switching from blended fee-for-service to blended capitation models of physician remuneration.
    Somé NH; Devlin RA; Mehta N; Zaric GS; Sarma S
    Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1435-1455. PubMed ID: 32812685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do physician-payment mechanisms affect hospital utilization? A study of Health Service Organizations in Ontario.
    Hutchison B; Birch S; Hurley J; Lomas J; Stratford-Devai F
    CMAJ; 1996 Mar; 154(5):653-61. PubMed ID: 8603321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of Diabetes Care in Blended Fee-for-Service and Blended Capitation Payment Systems.
    Bamimore MA; Devlin RA; Zaric GS; Garg AX; Sarma S
    Can J Diabetes; 2021 Apr; 45(3):261-268.e11. PubMed ID: 33162371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agency theory: a framework for analyzing physician services.
    Pontes MC
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1995; 20(4):57-67. PubMed ID: 8543471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk selection and cost shifting in a prospective physician payment system: evidence from Ontario.
    Kantarevic J; Kralj B
    Health Policy; 2014 Apr; 115(2-3):249-57. PubMed ID: 24210763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How payment systems affect physicians' provision behaviour--an experimental investigation.
    Hennig-Schmidt H; Selten R; Wiesen D
    J Health Econ; 2011 Jul; 30(4):637-46. PubMed ID: 21683460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Service production and contract choice in primary physician services.
    Sørensen RJ; Grytten J
    Health Policy; 2003 Oct; 66(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 14499167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Getting Incentives Right? The Impact of Hospital Capitation Payment in Vietnam.
    Nguyen HT; Bales S; Wagstaff A; Dao H
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26(2):263-272. PubMed ID: 26676963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician remuneration schemes, psychiatric hospitalizations and follow-up care: Evidence from blended fee-for-service and capitation models.
    Vu T; Anderson KK; Devlin RA; Somé NH; Sarma S
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Jan; 268():113465. PubMed ID: 33128977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paying for Primary Care: The Factors Associated with Physician Self-selection into Payment Models.
    Rudoler D; Deber R; Barnsley J; Glazier RH; Dass AR; Laporte A
    Health Econ; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1229-42. PubMed ID: 26190516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of remuneration and organizational factors on completing preventive manoeuvres in primary care practices.
    Dahrouge S; Hogg WE; Russell G; Tuna M; Geneau R; Muldoon LK; Kristjansson E; Fletcher J
    CMAJ; 2012 Feb; 184(2):E135-43. PubMed ID: 22143227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does a year make a difference? Changes in physician satisfaction and perception in an increasingly capitated environment.
    Nadler ES; Sims S; Tyrance PH; Fairchild DG; Brennan TA; Bates DW
    Am J Med; 1999 Jul; 107(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 10403351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Family physician remuneration schemes and specialist referrals: Quasi-experimental evidence from Ontario, Canada.
    Sarma S; Mehta N; Devlin RA; Kpelitse KA; Li L
    Health Econ; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1533-1549. PubMed ID: 29943455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sorting into payment schemes and medical treatment: A laboratory experiment.
    Brosig-Koch J; Kairies-Schwarz N; Kokot J
    Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26 Suppl 3():52-65. PubMed ID: 29285865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physician earnings at risk: an examination of capitated contracts.
    Simon CJ; Emmons DW
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1997; 16(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 9141328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The alignment and blending of payment incentives within physician organizations.
    Robinson JC; Shortell SM; Li R; Casalino LP; Rundall T
    Health Serv Res; 2004 Oct; 39(5):1589-606. PubMed ID: 15333124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physician remuneration methods: the need for change and flexibility.
    Wright CJ
    CMAJ; 1996 Mar; 154(5):678-80. PubMed ID: 8603324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.