251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26239630)
1. Effect of T2* correction on contrast kinetic model analysis using a reference tissue arterial input function at 7 T.
Zhang J; Freed M; Winters K; Kim SG
MAGMA; 2015 Dec; 28(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 26239630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. T2*-correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI from double-echo acquisitions.
Kleppestø M; Larsson C; Groote I; Salo R; Vardal J; Courivaud F; Bjørnerud A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 24123598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters.
Ocak I; Bernardo M; Metzger G; Barrett T; Pinto P; Albert PS; Choyke PL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):849. PubMed ID: 17885055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. R2* Relaxation Affects Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Cancer and Underestimates Treatment Response at 7 T.
Kim J; Moestue SA; Bathen TF; Kim E
Tomography; 2019 Sep; 5(3):308-319. PubMed ID: 31572792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the effect of haematocrit-dependent arterial input functions on the accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Just N; Koh DM; D'Arcy J; Collins DJ; Leach MO
NMR Biomed; 2011 Aug; 24(7):902-15. PubMed ID: 21290457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis using an arterial input function (AIF) extracted from popliteal artery enhancement, and the effect of the choice of the AIF on the kinetic parameters.
Workie DW; Dardzinski BJ
Magn Reson Med; 2005 Sep; 54(3):560-8. PubMed ID: 16088875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.
Fennessy FM; Fedorov A; Penzkofer T; Kim KW; Hirsch MS; Vangel MG; Masry P; Flood TA; Chang MC; Tempany CM; Mulkern RV; Gupta SN
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):886-94. PubMed ID: 25683515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.
Yankeelov TE; Luci JJ; Lepage M; Li R; Debusk L; Lin PC; Price RR; Gore JC
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 15919597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flow versus permeability weighting in estimating the forward volumetric transfer constant (K
Li CH; Chen FH; Schellingerhout D; Lin YS; Hong JH; Liu HL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36():105-111. PubMed ID: 27989901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?
Wake N; Chandarana H; Rusinek H; Fujimoto K; Moy L; Sodickson DK; Kim SG
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():16-23. PubMed ID: 29777820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameter ratios in DCE-MRI using the reference region model.
Lee J; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 30(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 22071409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of liver fibrosis using pharmacokinetic parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Li Z; Sun J; Chen L; Huang N; Hu P; Hu X; Han G; Zhou Y; Bai W; Niu T; Yang X
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 26707910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats.
McGrath DM; Bradley DP; Tessier JL; Lacey T; Taylor CJ; Parker GJ
Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1173-84. PubMed ID: 19253360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
