These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26239642)
21. Curbing false discovery rates in interpretation of genome-wide expression profiles. Ycart B; Pont F; Fournié JJ J Biomed Inform; 2014 Feb; 47():58-61. PubMed ID: 24060601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Bayesian decision procedure for testing multiple hypotheses in DNA microarray experiments. Gómez-Villegas MA; Salazar I; Sanz L Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Feb; 13(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24317791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multiple testing in disease mapping and descriptive epidemiology. Catelan D; Biggeri A Geospat Health; 2010 May; 4(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 20503190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies. Shin J; Lee C Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis. Liu P; Hwang JT Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies. Datta S; Datta S Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The optimal discovery procedure in multiple significance testing: an empirical Bayes approach. Noma H; Matsui S Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 21969277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. On the sample size requirement in genetic association tests when the proportion of false positives is controlled. Zou G; Zuo Y Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):687-91. PubMed ID: 16204206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mixed directional false discovery rate control in multiple pairwise comparisons using weighted p-values. Zhao H; Peddada SD; Cui X Biom J; 2015 Jan; 57(1):144-58. PubMed ID: 25410394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. P-value calibration for multiple testing problems in genomics. Ferguson JP; Palejev D Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Dec; 13(6):659-73. PubMed ID: 25332297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sample size calculations for controlling the distribution of false discovery proportion in microarray experiments. Oura T; Matsui S; Kawakami K Biostatistics; 2009 Oct; 10(4):694-705. PubMed ID: 19628638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Challenging false discovery rate: a partition test based on p values in human case-control association studies. Ott J; Liu Z; Shen Y Hum Hered; 2012; 74(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 23154528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nonparametric bayesian estimation of positive false discovery rates. Tang Y; Ghosal S; Roy A Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1126-34. PubMed ID: 17501943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression. Qian HR; Huang S Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Identification of differentially expressed genes and false discovery rate in microarray studies. Gusnanto A; Calza S; Pawitan Y Curr Opin Lipidol; 2007 Apr; 18(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 17353668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Increased power of microarray analysis by use of an algorithm based on a multivariate procedure. Krohn K; Eszlinger M; Paschke R; Roeder I; Schuster E Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21(17):3530-4. PubMed ID: 15998661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Significance analysis of ROC indices for comparing diagnostic markers: applications to gene microarray data. Tsai CA; Chen JJ J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):985-1003. PubMed ID: 15587976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]