These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2623971)

  • 1. [Root canal preparation with Canal-Finder system. Scanning electron microscopy and clinical studies].
    Hülsmann M; Meyer G
    ZWR; 1989 Feb; 98(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 2623971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Preparation of curved root canals using hand instruments and mechanical aids].
    Hülsmann M; Bertzbach F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 2630269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [SEM studies on root canal preparation using ultrasound].
    Beer R; Gängler P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 2639044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation.
    Hülsmann M; Stryga F
    J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of cutting efficiency of hand, gyromatic and path-finder root canal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study.
    Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8180277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of hand, sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation on the shape of curved root canals.
    Tang MP; Stock CJ
    Int Endod J; 1989 Mar; 22(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 2599662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study.
    Vera J; Siqueira JF; Ricucci D; Loghin S; Fernández N; Flores B; Cruz AG
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1040-52. PubMed ID: 22794203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.
    Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of two different methods for preparing curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Spielberg C; Olmos J
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1994 Oct; 10(5):215-9. PubMed ID: 7843062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of RaCe instrumentation system in curved root canals: a comprehensive analysis by three study methods.
    Leonardi DP; Sydney GB; Tanomaru MF; Baratto-Filho F; Baratto SS; Cerri PS
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 23969911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of precurving endosonic files on the amount of debris and smear layer remaining in curved root canals.
    Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Walton RE; Rippin JW
    J Endod; 1992 Dec; 18(12):616-9. PubMed ID: 1298802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.