225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26239756)
1. Configurational salience of landmarks: an analysis of sketch maps using Space Syntax.
von Stülpnagel R; Frankenstein J
Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():437-41. PubMed ID: 26239756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Landmarks in nature to support wayfinding: the effects of seasons and experimental methods.
Kettunen P; Irvankoski K; Krause CM; Sarjakoski LT
Cogn Process; 2013 Aug; 14(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 23392783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Turn left where you felt unhappy: how affect influences landmark-based wayfinding.
Balaban CZ; Karimpur H; Röser F; Hamburger K
Cogn Process; 2017 May; 18(2):135-144. PubMed ID: 28070686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gardony Map Drawing Analyzer: Software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps.
Gardony AL; Taylor HA; Brunyé TT
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):151-77. PubMed ID: 25673320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge in a virtual maze.
Gillner S; Mallot HA
J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jul; 10(4):445-63. PubMed ID: 9712675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Geographical slant facilitates navigation and orientation in virtual environments.
Restat JD; Steck SD; Mochnatzki HF; Mallot HA
Perception; 2004; 33(6):667-87. PubMed ID: 15330364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Route memory in an unfamiliar homogeneous environment: a comparison of two strategies.
Sameer A; Bhushan B
Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():149-52. PubMed ID: 26224259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.
Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F
Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environment learning from virtual exploration in individuals with down syndrome: the role of perspective and sketch maps.
Toffalini E; Meneghetti C; Carretti B; Lanfranchi S
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 29124810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Considering spatial ability in virtual route learning in early aging.
Gyselinck V; Meneghetti C; Bormetti M; Orriols E; Piolino P; De Beni R
Cogn Process; 2013 Aug; 14(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 23536003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation.
Andersen NE; Dahmani L; Konishi K; Bohbot VD
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Jan; 97(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 22001012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age and gender differences in various topographical orientation strategies.
Liu I; Levy RM; Barton JJ; Iaria G
Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1410():112-9. PubMed ID: 21803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks.
Auger SD; Mullally SL; Maguire EA
PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43620. PubMed ID: 22912894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial knowledge acquisition in younger and elderly adults: a study in a virtual environment.
Jansen P; Schmelter A; Heil M
Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 20178963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One spatial map or many? Spatial coding of connected environments.
Han X; Becker S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):511-531. PubMed ID: 24364723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Giessen virtual environment laboratory: human wayfinding and landmark salience.
Röser F; Hamburger K; Knauff M
Cogn Process; 2011 May; 12(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 21279666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wormholes in virtual space: From cognitive maps to cognitive graphs.
Warren WH; Rothman DB; Schnapp BH; Ericson JD
Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():152-163. PubMed ID: 28577445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial radial maze procedures and setups to dissociate local and distal relational spatial frameworks in humans.
Bertholet L; Escobar MT; Depré M; Chavan CF; Giuliani F; Gisquet-Verrier P; Preissmann D; Schenk F
J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Sep; 253():126-41. PubMed ID: 26096715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Training, transfer, and retention of three-dimensional spatial memory in virtual environments.
Richards JT; Oman CM; Shebilske WL; Beall AC; Liu A; Natapoff A
J Vestib Res; 2002-2003; 12(5-6):223-38. PubMed ID: 14501100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
