These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26239785)
1. Metric Development for an Arthroscopic Bankart Procedure: Assessment of Face and Content Validity. Angelo RL; Ryu RK; Pedowitz RA; Gallagher AG Arthroscopy; 2015 Aug; 31(8):1430-40. PubMed ID: 26239785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Metrics: Establishing Face, Content, and Construct Validity in a Cadaveric Model. Angelo RL; Tauro J; St Pierre P; Ross G; Voloshin I; Shafer B; Ryu RKN; McIntyre L; Gallagher AG Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):71-79.e1. PubMed ID: 31864602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Bankart Performance Metrics Combined With a Shoulder Model Simulator Create a Precise and Accurate Training Tool for Measuring Surgeon Skill. Angelo RL; Pedowitz RA; Ryu RK; Gallagher AG Arthroscopy; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1639-54. PubMed ID: 26129726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Bankart Performance Metrics Combined With a Cadaveric Shoulder Create a Precise and Accurate Assessment Tool for Measuring Surgeon Skill. Angelo RL; Ryu RK; Pedowitz RA; Gallagher AG Arthroscopy; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1655-70. PubMed ID: 26238730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AO international consensus panel for metrics on a closed reduction and fixation of a 31A2 pertrochanteric fracture. Kojima K; Graves M; Taha W; Cunningham M; Joeris A; Gallagher AG Injury; 2018 Dec; 49(12):2227-2233. PubMed ID: 30268512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. International expert consensus on a scientific approach to training novice cardiac resynchronization therapy implanters using performance quality metrics. Mascheroni J; Mont L; Stockburger M; Patwala A; Retzlaff H; Gallagher AG; Int J Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 289():63-69. PubMed ID: 31088758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Proficiency-Based Progression Training Curriculum Coupled With a Model Simulator Results in the Acquisition of a Superior Arthroscopic Bankart Skill Set. Angelo RL; Ryu RK; Pedowitz RA; Beach W; Burns J; Dodds J; Field L; Getelman M; Hobgood R; McIntyre L; Gallagher AG Arthroscopy; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1854-71. PubMed ID: 26341047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of technical aspects of the arthroscopic Bankart procedure as performed in the United States. Burks RT; Presson AP; Weng HY Arthroscopy; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1246-53. PubMed ID: 25064758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-rater Reliability for Metrics Scored in a Binary Fashion-Performance Assessment for an Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. Gallagher AG; Ryu RKN; Pedowitz RA; Henn P; Angelo RL Arthroscopy; 2018 Jul; 34(7):2191-2198. PubMed ID: 29730215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk factors for recurrent instability or revision surgery following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Mahure SA; Mollon B; Capogna BM; Zuckerman JD; Kwon YW; Rokito AS Bone Joint J; 2018 Mar; 100-B(3):324-330. PubMed ID: 29589497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of performance and error metrics for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Ahmed OM; O'Donnell BD; Gallagher AG; Shorten GD Adv Med Educ Pract; 2017; 8():257-263. PubMed ID: 28435344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of Bankart repair in contact versus non-contact athletes. Yamamoto N; Kijima H; Nagamoto H; Kurokawa D; Takahashi H; Sano H; Itoi E Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 101(4):415-9. PubMed ID: 25907514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. International consensus panel for transurethral resection of bladder tumours metrics: assessment of face and content validity. Paciotti M; Diana P; Gallioli A; De Groote R; Farinha R; Ficarra V; Gaston R; Gontero P; Hurle R; Martínez-Piñeiro L; Minervini A; Pansadoro V; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Wiklund P; Casale P; Lughezzani G; Uleri A; Mottrie A; Palou J; Gallagher AG; Breda A; Buffi N BJU Int; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38830818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of shoulder instability: the current state of treatment among German orthopaedic surgeons. Balke M; Shafizadeh S; Bouillon B; Banerjee M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Dec; 136(12):1717-1721. PubMed ID: 27501704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. Chuang TY; Adams CR; Burkhart SS Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 18375267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-Term Restoration of Anterior Shoulder Stability: A Retrospective Analysis of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet Procedure. Zimmermann SM; Scheyerer MJ; Farshad M; Catanzaro S; Rahm S; Gerber C J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Dec; 98(23):1954-1961. PubMed ID: 27926676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of a basic arthroscopy skills simulator. Braman JP; Sweet RM; Hananel DM; Ludewig PM; Van Heest AE Arthroscopy; 2015 Jan; 31(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 25239171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical trends in Bankart repair: an analysis of data from the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery certification examination. Owens BD; Harrast JJ; Hurwitz SR; Thompson TL; Wolf JM Am J Sports Med; 2011 Sep; 39(9):1865-9. PubMed ID: 21628637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]