BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26239855)

  • 1. [Non-invasive prenatal testing is a breakthrough in prenatal screening].
    Hornstrup LS; Ambye L; Sørensen S; Jørgensen FS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2015 Jul; 177(28):. PubMed ID: 26239855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cell-Free DNA Testing for Fetal Chromosomal Anomalies in clinical practice: Austrian-German-Swiss Recommendations for non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT).
    Schmid M; Klaritsch P; Arzt W; Burkhardt T; Duba HC; Häusler M; Hafner E; Lang U; Pertl B; Speicher M; Steiner H; Tercanli S; Merz E; Heling KS; Eiben B
    Ultraschall Med; 2015 Oct; 36(5):507-10. PubMed ID: 26468773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Beulen L; Grutters JP; Faas BH; Feenstra I; van Vugt JM; Bekker MN
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():53-61. PubMed ID: 25238658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From Down syndrome screening to noninvasive prenatal testing: 20 years' experience in Taiwan.
    Shaw SW; Chen CP; Cheng PJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 52(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 24411028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and impact on invasive procedures in a tertiary referral center.
    Manegold-Brauer G; Berg C; Flöck A; Rüland A; Gembruch U; Geipel A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 25716672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome in Australia: costs and benefits of current and novel screening strategies.
    O'Leary P; Maxwell S; Murch A; Hendrie D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Oct; 53(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 24090461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in the general pregnancy population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Fairbrother G; Burigo J; Sharon T; Song K
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(7):1160-4. PubMed ID: 26000626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical perspective of cell-free DNA testing for fetal aneuploidies.
    Gratacós E; Nicolaides K
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2014; 35(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 24931002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An update on current prenatal testing options: first trimester and noninvasive prenatal testing.
    Latendresse G; Deneris A
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(1):24-36; quiz 111. PubMed ID: 25712277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cell-free DNA screening for trisomy is rolled out in Israel.
    Petherick A
    Lancet; 2013 Sep; 382(9895):846. PubMed ID: 24020067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Second tier non-invasive prenatal testing in a regional prenatal diagnosis service unit: a retrospective analysis and literature review.
    Ng VKS; Chan AL; Lau WL; Leung WC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2020 Feb; 26(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 32051331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noninvasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy.
    Robinson C; van den Boom D; Bombard AT
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 57(1):210-25. PubMed ID: 24351443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-invasive prenatal testing.
    Harraway J
    Aust Fam Physician; 2017 Oct; 46(10):735-739. PubMed ID: 29036772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies in a routinely screened first-trimester population.
    Nicolaides KH; Syngelaki A; Ashoor G; Birdir C; Touzet G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 207(5):374.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23107079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive view and increased likely uptake of follow-up testing with analysis of cell-free fetal DNA as alternative to invasive testing among Danish pregnant women.
    Miltoft CB; Rode L; Tabor A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 May; 97(5):577-586. PubMed ID: 29350746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.
    Grace MR; Hardisty E; Dotters-Katz SK; Vora NL; Kuller JA
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2016 Aug; 71(8):477-87. PubMed ID: 27526871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal Plasma DNA and RNA Sequencing for Prenatal Testing.
    Tamminga S; van Maarle M; Henneman L; Oudejans CB; Cornel MC; Sistermans EA
    Adv Clin Chem; 2016; 74():63-102. PubMed ID: 27117661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Non-invasive genetic tests for fetal trisomy 21 detection: current considerations].
    Benachi A; Costa JM
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2014 Mar; 43(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 24529921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Still a screening test: more attention needed to noninvasive prenatal test false-positive rates.
    Reiss RE; Cherry AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 209(2):160-1. PubMed ID: 23583784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of noninvasive prenatal testing as a diagnostic versus a screening tool--a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ohno M; Caughey A
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Jul; 33(7):630-5. PubMed ID: 23674316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.