These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26239925)

  • 1. The shear effort of measurement of portal hypertension.
    Sanchez W; Kamath PS
    Hepatology; 2015 Dec; 62(6):1909-11. PubMed ID: 26239925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time shear-wave elastography: applicability, reliability and accuracy for clinically significant portal hypertension.
    Procopet B; Berzigotti A; Abraldes JG; Turon F; Hernandez-Gea V; García-Pagán JC; Bosch J
    J Hepatol; 2015 May; 62(5):1068-75. PubMed ID: 25514554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical value of liver and spleen shear wave velocity in predicting the prognosis of patients with portal hypertension.
    Zhang Y; Mao DF; Zhang MW; Fan XX
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 23(45):8044-8052. PubMed ID: 29259380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasonography for Noninvasive Assessment of Portal Hypertension.
    Maruyama H; Yokosuka O
    Gut Liver; 2017 Jul; 11(4):464-473. PubMed ID: 28267700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Meta-analysis for the Diagnostic Performance of Transient Elastography for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension.
    You MW; Kim KW; Pyo J; Huh J; Kim HJ; Lee SJ; Park SH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 27751595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of point shear wave elastography in the detection of portal hypertension in pediatric patients.
    Burak Özkan M; Bilgici MC; Eren E; Caltepe G
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Mar; 99(3):151-156. PubMed ID: 29150327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supersonic shear imaging for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension in liver diseases: a meta-analysis.
    Deng H; Qi X; Zhang T; Qi X; Yoshida EM; Guo X
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Jan; 12(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 29186994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sonographic assessment of spleen stiffness before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement with or without concurrent embolization of portal systemic collateral veins in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a feasibility study.
    Novelli PM; Cho K; Rubin JM
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Mar; 34(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 25715365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Point Shear Wave Elastography to Evaluate and Monitor Changing Portal Venous Pressure in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis.
    Han H; Yang J; Zhuge YZ; Zhang M; Wu M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1134-1140. PubMed ID: 28335998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of portal hypertension by real-time shear wave elastography in cirrhotic patients.
    Kim TY; Jeong WK; Sohn JH; Kim J; Kim MY; Kim Y
    Liver Int; 2015 Nov; 35(11):2416-24. PubMed ID: 25875718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards compression-sensitive magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: sensitivity of harmonic volumetric strain to portal hypertension.
    Hirsch S; Guo J; Reiter R; Schott E; Büning C; Somasundaram R; Braun J; Sack I; Kroencke TJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 23649541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reply: To PMID 22488593.
    Hiasa Y; Ochi H; Hirooka M
    Hepatology; 2013 Aug; 58(2):834-5. PubMed ID: 23280450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liver stiffness measurement, better than APRI, Fibroindex, Fib-4, and NBI gastroscopy, predicts portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.
    Zhang W; Wang L; Wang L; Li G; Huang A; Yin P; Yang Z; Ling C; Wang L
    Cell Biochem Biophys; 2015 Mar; 71(2):865-73. PubMed ID: 25417057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Splenic elasticity measured with real-time tissue elastography is a marker of portal hypertension.
    Hirooka M; Ochi H; Koizumi Y; Kisaka Y; Abe M; Ikeda Y; Matsuura B; Hiasa Y; Onji M
    Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):960-8. PubMed ID: 21926379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography with propagation-based reliability assessment for grading hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension.
    Maruyama H; Kobayashi K; Kiyono S; Sekimoto T; Kanda T; Yokosuka O
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2016 Sep; 23(9):595-602. PubMed ID: 27440720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time tissue elastography in the assessment of liver stiffness.
    Ferraioli G; Lissandrin R; Filice C
    Hepatology; 2013 Aug; 58(2):834. PubMed ID: 23280434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modification of splenic stiffness on acoustic radiation force impulse parallels the variation of portal pressure induced by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
    De Santis A; Nardelli S; Bassanelli C; Lupo M; Iegri C; Di Ciesco CA; Forlino M; Farcomeni A; Riggio O
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 33(3):704-709. PubMed ID: 28753738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elastography methods for the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension.
    Roccarina D; Rosselli M; Genesca J; Tsochatzis EA
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Feb; 12(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 28856972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using transient elastography.
    Castera L; Pinzani M; Bosch J
    J Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 56(3):696-703. PubMed ID: 21767510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are there any alternative methods to hepatic venous pressure gradient in portal hypertension assessment?
    Procopeţ B; Tantau M; Bureau C
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2013 Mar; 22(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23539394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.