These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26240286)

  • 1. ACCESS OF SINGLE WOMEN TO FERTILITY TREATMENT: A CASE OF INCIDENTAL DISCRIMINATION?
    Krajewska A
    Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(4):620-45. PubMed ID: 26240286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rights to sexual and reproductive health: the ICPD and the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women.
    Shalev C
    Health Hum Rights; 2000; 4(2):38-66. PubMed ID: 10796970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protecting embryos and burdening women: assisted reproduction in Italy.
    Robertson JA
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Aug; 19(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 15229207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restricted access to assisted reproductive technology and fertility preservation: legal and ethical issues.
    Oliveira BL; Ataman LM; Rodrigues JK; Birchal TS; Reis FM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Sep; 43(3):571-576. PubMed ID: 34332903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ICMR guidelines on assisted reproductive technology: lacking in vision, wrapped in red tape.
    Murthy L; Subramanian V
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2007; 4(3):123-4. PubMed ID: 18624141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1104-10. PubMed ID: 26364838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical arguments for access to abortion services in the Republic of Ireland: recent developments in the public discourse.
    McCarthy J; O'Donnell K; Campbell L; Dooley D
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Aug; 44(8):513-517. PubMed ID: 29776978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Provision of assisted reproductive technology for single women in China: a new challenge.
    Zhou LJ
    Med Law; 2004; 23(2):433-51. PubMed ID: 15270480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RESOLVE and access to care: the patient response to anti-family policies.
    Collura B; Collins LR
    Semin Reprod Med; 2013 May; 31(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 23609154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology.
    Parks J
    Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International human rights and women's reproductive health.
    Cook RJ
    Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 8511808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal mortality and morbidity: a human rights imperative.
    Pillay N
    Lancet; 2013 Apr; 381(9873):1159-60. PubMed ID: 23561986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethico-legal issues in home birth.
    Jones S
    RCM Midwives; 2003 Mar; 6(3):126-8. PubMed ID: 12677851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion and human rights.
    Shaw D
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):633-46. PubMed ID: 20303830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Catholic doctrine versus women's rights: the new Italian law on assisted reproduction.
    Fenton RA
    Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(1):73-107. PubMed ID: 16787908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes.
    Quinn M; Fujimoto V
    Fertil Steril; 2016 May; 105(5):1119-1123. PubMed ID: 27054308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diversity of regulation and public financing of IVF in Europe and its impact on utilization.
    Berg Brigham K; Cadier B; Chevreul K
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar; 28(3):666-75. PubMed ID: 23223400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Access to abortion.
    Read JE; Smith BJ
    CMAJ; 2007 Feb; 176(4):492; author reply 494. PubMed ID: 17296966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should uterus transplants be publicly funded?
    Wilkinson S; Williams NJ
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Sep; 42(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 26670671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy.
    Stephenson PA; Wagner MG
    J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.