These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26240853)

  • 1. An open-population hierarchical distance sampling model.
    Sollmann R; Gardner B; Chandler RB; Royle JA; Sillett TS
    Ecology; 2015 Feb; 96(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 26240853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hierarchical distance-sampling models to estimate population size and habitat-specific abundance of an island endemic.
    Sillett TS; Chandler RB; Royle JA; Kery M; Morrison SA
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Oct; 22(7):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 23210315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Replicated sampling increases efficiency in monitoring biological populations.
    Dennis B; Ponciano JM; Taper ML
    Ecology; 2010 Feb; 91(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 20392025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model-based approach for making ecological inference from distance sampling data.
    Johnson DS; Laake JL; Ver Hoef JM
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):310-8. PubMed ID: 19459840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating trend precision and power to detect trends across grouped count data.
    Gray BR; Burlew MM
    Ecology; 2007 Sep; 88(9):2364-72. PubMed ID: 17918413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating data from multiple sources for insights into demographic processes: Simulation studies and proof of concept for hierarchical change-in-ratio models.
    Nilsen EB; Strand O
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194566. PubMed ID: 29596430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inferring invasive species abundance using removal data from management actions.
    Davis AJ; Hooten MB; Miller RS; Farnsworth ML; Lewis J; Moxcey M; Pepin KM
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 27755739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An integrated population model for bird monitoring in North America.
    Ahrestani FS; Saracco JF; Sauer JR; Pardieck KL; Royle JA
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):916-924. PubMed ID: 28036137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating population dynamics models and distance sampling data: a spatial hierarchical state-space approach.
    Nadeem K; Moore JE; Zhang Y; Chipman H
    Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1735-1745. PubMed ID: 27859153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Road-based line distance surveys overestimate densities of olive baboons.
    Kiffner C; Paciência FMD; Henrich G; Kaitila R; Chuma IS; Mbaryo P; Knauf S; Kioko J; Zinner D
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263314. PubMed ID: 35108346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating abundance of an open population with an N-mixture model using auxiliary data on animal movements.
    Ketz AC; Johnson TL; Monello RJ; Mack JA; George JL; Kraft BR; Wild MA; Hooten MB; Hobbs NT
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Apr; 28(3):816-825. PubMed ID: 29405475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatially explicit power analyses for occupancy-based monitoring of wolverine in the U.S. Rocky Mountains.
    Ellis MM; Ivan JS; Schwartz MK
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 24001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sampling strategies for species with high breeding-site fidelity: A case study in burrow-nesting seabirds.
    Arneill GE; Perrins CM; Wood MJ; Murphy D; Pisani L; Jessopp MJ; Quinn JL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221625. PubMed ID: 31454375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating population impacts via dynamic occupancy analysis of Before-After Control-Impact studies.
    Popescu VD; de Valpine P; Tempel D; Peery MZ
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Jun; 22(4):1389-404. PubMed ID: 22827142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should scientists be required to use a model-based solution to adjust for possible distance-based detectability bias?
    Hutto RL
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jul; 26(5):1287-1294. PubMed ID: 27755748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatially explicit power analysis for detecting occupancy trends for multiple species.
    Southwell DM; Einoder LD; Lahoz-Monfort JJ; Fisher A; Gillespie GR; Wintle BA
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Sep; 29(6):e01950. PubMed ID: 31187919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hierarchical modelling and estimation of abundance and population trends in metapopulation designs.
    Kéry M; Andrew Royle J
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Mar; 79(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 19886893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Presence-absence versus abundance data for monitoring threatened species.
    Joseph LN; Field SA; Wilcox C; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1679-87. PubMed ID: 17181803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for imperfect detection of groups and individuals when estimating abundance.
    Clement MJ; Converse SJ; Royle JA
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(18):7304-7310. PubMed ID: 28944018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the effects of detection heterogeneity and overdispersion on trends estimated from avian point counts.
    Etterson MA; Niemi GJ; Danz NP
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Dec; 19(8):2049-66. PubMed ID: 20014578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.