These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26241754)

  • 1. Preservation of imaging capability in sensitive ultrasound contrast agents after indirect plasma sterilization.
    Albala L; Ercan UK; Joshi SG; Eisenbrey JR; Teraphongphom N; Wheatley MA
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Oct; 494(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 26241754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plasma sterilization of poly lactic acid ultrasound contrast agents: surface modification and implications for drug delivery.
    Eisenbrey JR; Hsu J; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1854-62. PubMed ID: 19766380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of nesting shell size on brightness longevity and resistance to ultrasound-induced dissolution during enhanced B-mode contrast imaging.
    Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Dec; 54(8):2099-108. PubMed ID: 25041980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging.
    Yang F; Li Y; Chen Z; Zhang Y; Wu J; Gu N
    Biomaterials; 2009 Aug; 30(23-24):3882-90. PubMed ID: 19395082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation of noninvasive blood pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Li F; Wang L; Fan Y; Li D
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Apr; 59(4):715-26. PubMed ID: 22547282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
    Koppolu S; Chitnis PV; Mamou J; Allen JS; Ketterling JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Mar; 62(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 25935932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 20 years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling.
    Faez T; Emmer M; Kooiman K; Versluis M; van der Steen A; de Jong N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 23287909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging.
    Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Shandas R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):557-73. PubMed ID: 16424581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction of a high-order Bessel beam with a submerged spherical ultrasound contrast agent shell - Scattering theory.
    Mitri FG
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Mar; 50(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 19833370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gas-generating polymeric microspheres for long-term and continuous in vivo ultrasound imaging.
    Min HS; Kang E; Koo H; Lee J; Kim K; Park RW; Kim IS; Choi Y; Kwon IC; Han M
    Biomaterials; 2012 Jan; 33(3):936-44. PubMed ID: 22050793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bubble sorting in pinched microchannels for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.
    Kok MP; Segers T; Versluis M
    Lab Chip; 2015; 15(18):3716-22. PubMed ID: 26223966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of environmental conditions on a new surfactant-based contrast agent: ST68.
    Basude R; Duckworth JW; Wheatley MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 May; 26(4):621-8. PubMed ID: 10856625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro analysis of ultrasound second generation contrast agent diluted in saline solution.
    Goddi A; Novario R; Tanzi F; Di Liberto R; Nucci P
    Radiol Med; 2004; 107(5-6):569-79. PubMed ID: 15195019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound Contrast Agent Modeling: A Review.
    Versluis M; Stride E; Lajoinie G; Dollet B; Segers T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):2117-2144. PubMed ID: 32546411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acoustic response of a novel 50:50 PLGA contrast agent.
    Wheatley MA; Forsberg F; Oum K; Ro R; El-Sherif D
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Nov; 44(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 16730047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of acoustic droplet vaporization for control of bubble generation under flow conditions.
    Kang ST; Huang YL; Yeh CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):551-61. PubMed ID: 24433748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of the effects of microbubble shell disruption on population scattering and implications for modeling contrast agent behavior.
    Chien CT; Burns PN
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Mar; 51(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 15128215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic bubble sorting for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.
    Segers T; Versluis M
    Lab Chip; 2014 May; 14(10):1705-14. PubMed ID: 24651248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surfactant shedding and gas diffusion during pulsed ultrasound through a microbubble contrast agent suspension.
    O'Brien JP; Stride E; Ovenden N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1416-27. PubMed ID: 23927137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
    Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.