227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26242151)
1. [LAPAROSCOPIC NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN CERVICAL CANCER].
Berlev IV; Ulrikh EA; Korolkova EN; Ibragimov ZN; Kashina NO; Mikhailyuk GI; Khadzhimba AV; Urmancheeva AF
Vopr Onkol; 2015; 61(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 26242151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).
Kietpeerakool C; Aue-Aungkul A; Galaal K; Ngamjarus C; Lumbiganon P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 2(2):CD012828. PubMed ID: 30746689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Success Factors of Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Preserving Bladder Function in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Protocol-Based Prospective Cohort Study.
Kim HS; Kim TH; Suh DH; Kim SY; Kim MA; Jeong CW; Hong KS; Song YS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015; 22(6):1987-95. PubMed ID: 25465377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study.
Hoogendam JP; Verheijen RH; Wegner I; Zweemer RP
BJOG; 2014 Nov; 121(12):1538-45. PubMed ID: 24735243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of postoperative bladder function and prognosis after modified nerve sparing radical hysterectomy].
Wenwen W; Bin L; Jing Z; Gongyi Z; Yeduo Y; Hongmei Z; Xiaoguang L; Lingying W
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 25030730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy for occult early-stage invasive cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy.
Li J; Xu H; Chen Y; Wang D; Li Y; Liang Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1383-8. PubMed ID: 22964523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current concepts and practical techniques of nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Kyo S; Kato T; Nakayama K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():80-88. PubMed ID: 27825032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: description of the technique and patients' outcome.
Kavallaris A; Hornemann A; Chalvatzas N; Luedders D; Diedrich K; Bohlmann MK
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 20701958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.
Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: extraperitoneal versus laparoscopic approach.
Larciprete G; Casalino B; Segatore MF; Jarvis S; Catarinella V; Cirese E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 16359771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
