These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26242171)

  • 41. Health management information system: a tool to gauge patient satisfaction and quality of care.
    Shaikh BT; Rabbani F
    East Mediterr Health J; 2005; 11(1-2):192-8. PubMed ID: 16532688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How can health care organizations be reliably compared?: Lessons from a national survey of patient experience.
    Lyratzopoulos G; Elliott MN; Barbiere JM; Staetsky L; Paddison CA; Campbell J; Roland M
    Med Care; 2011 Aug; 49(8):724-33. PubMed ID: 21610543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. IVR Test & Survey: a computer program to collect data via computerized telephonic applications.
    Janda LH; Janda M; Tedford E
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2001 Nov; 33(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 11816454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Interactive voice response: review of studies 1989-2000.
    Corkrey R; Parkinson L
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Aug; 34(3):342-53. PubMed ID: 12395550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reacting to Patient Experience Results - How Can We Be Proactive?
    Wojtak A
    Healthc Pap; 2017 Oct; 17(2):34-39. PubMed ID: 29595442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Voice acoustic measures of depression severity and treatment response collected via interactive voice response (IVR) technology.
    Mundt JC; Snyder PJ; Cannizzaro MS; Chappie K; Geralts DS
    J Neurolinguistics; 2007 Jan; 20(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 21253440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Measuring patient satisfaction: a case study.
    Ryan ME; Collins FJ; Dowd JB; Pierce PK
    J Nurs Care Qual; 1995 Jan; 9(2):44-53. PubMed ID: 7881119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Routine Collection of Patient-Reported Data to Support the Needs of Primary Care Within an Integrated Healthcare System.
    Slater M; Baraki AG; Donnelly C
    Healthc Q; 2024 Apr; 27(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 38881486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Closing the feedback loop: an interactive voice response system to provide follow-up and feedback in primary care settings.
    Willig JH; Krawitz M; Panjamapirom A; Ray MN; Nevin CR; English TM; Cohen MP; Berner ES
    J Med Syst; 2013 Apr; 37(2):9905. PubMed ID: 23340825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interactive voice response technology for outcomes monitoring.
    McDaniel AM
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2004; 18(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 15061440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparison of broad versus deep auditory menu structures.
    Commarford PM; Lewis JR; Smither JA; Gentzler MD
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 18354973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An efficient technique for communicating reports of laboratory and radiographic studies to patients in a primary care practice.
    Ridgeway NA; Ginn DR; Harvill LM; Hubbs DT; Massengill RM
    Am J Med; 2000 May; 108(7):575-7. PubMed ID: 10806287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Data Collection on Sensitive Topics with Adolescents Using Interactive Voice Response Technology.
    Fomby P; Sastry N
    Methoden Daten Anal; 2019; 13(1):91-110. PubMed ID: 31031869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Terry's parrot died: adventures in voice recognition.
    Travers R
    Med J Aust; 2017 Dec; 207(11):495. PubMed ID: 29227779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Differences in Mode Preferences, Response Rates, and Mode Effect Between Automated Email and Phone Survey Systems for Patients of Primary Care Practices: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Johnston S; Hogg W; Wong ST; Burge F; Peterson S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e21240. PubMed ID: 33427675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. User Perceptions and Experiences of an Interactive Voice Response Mobile Phone Survey Pilot in Uganda: Qualitative Study.
    Tweheyo R; Selig H; Gibson DG; Pariyo GW; Rutebemberwa E
    JMIR Form Res; 2020 Dec; 4(12):e21671. PubMed ID: 33270037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perceptions on using interactive voice response surveys for non-communicable disease risk factors in Uganda: a qualitative exploration.
    Rutebemberwa E; Namutundu J; Gibson DG; Labrique AB; Ali J; Pariyo GW; Hyder AA
    Mhealth; 2019; 5():32. PubMed ID: 31620459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Screening for Adverse Drug Events: a Randomized Trial of Automated Calls Coupled with Phone-Based Pharmacist Counseling.
    Schiff GD; Klinger E; Salazar A; Medoff J; Amato MG; John Orav E; Shaykevich S; Seoane EV; Walsh L; Fuller TE; Dykes PC; Bates DW; Haas JS
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 34(2):285-292. PubMed ID: 30291602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A scoping review to explore the suitability of interactive voice response to conduct automated performance measurement of the patient's experience in primary care.
    Falconi M; Johnston S; Hogg W
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2016 May; 17(3):209-25. PubMed ID: 26242171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Feasibility of an interactive voice response tool for adolescent assault victims.
    Blackstone MM; Wiebe DJ; Mollen CJ; Kalra A; Fein JA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 16(10):956-62. PubMed ID: 19799571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.