123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26242945)
1. Disclosure Two Ways.
Bernstein EB
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 26242945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distinctions in Disclosure: Mandated Informed Consent in Abortion and ART.
Daar J
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(2):255-8. PubMed ID: 26242946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A matter of context: Casey and the constitutionality of compelled physician speech.
Gaylord SW
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 25846037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Casey meets the crisis pregnancy centers.
Hill BJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 25846039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned Parenthood v. Sunquist.
Tennessee. Supreme Court
Wests South West Report; 2000; 38():1-52. PubMed ID: 16479697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed or Misinformed Consent? Abortion Policy in the United States.
Daniels CR; Ferguson J; Howard G; Roberti A
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2016 Apr; 41(2):181-209. PubMed ID: 26732319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When states regulate emergency contraceptives like abortion, what should guide disclosure?
Flynn CO; Wilson RF
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 25846040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preterm Cleveland v. Voinovich.
Ohio. Court of Appeals, Franklin County
Wests North East Rep; 1993 Jul; 627():570-92. PubMed ID: 12041182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Barnes v. Moore.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1992 Aug; 970():12-6. PubMed ID: 11648402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The politics of information: informed consent in abortion and end-of-life decision making.
Suter SM
Am J Law Med; 2013; 39(1):7-61. PubMed ID: 23678787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal pain legislation: is it viable?
Collett TS
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 Jan; 30(2):161-84. PubMed ID: 15237508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
Berlin SI
Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The first amendment and physician speech in reproductive decision making.
Suter SM
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 25846036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Procreative torts: enhancing the common-law protection for reproductive autonomy.
Northern KS
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1998; 1998(2):489-546. PubMed ID: 12774812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 6629744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
