These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26243646)

  • 1. Five algorithms that calculate cardiac output from the arterial waveform: a comparison with Doppler ultrasound.
    Zhang J; Critchley LA; Huang L
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):392-402. PubMed ID: 26243646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Major Upper Abdominal Surgery Alters the Calibration of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Readings, the NICOM, When Comparisons Are Made Against Suprasternal and Esophageal Doppler Intraoperatively.
    Huang L; Critchley LAH; Zhang J
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):936-945. PubMed ID: 26218863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of cardiac output measured by oesophageal Doppler ultrasonography or pulse pressure contour wave analysis.
    Caillard A; Gayat E; Tantot A; Dubreuil G; M'Bakulu E; Madadaki C; Bart F; Bresson D; Froelich S; Mebazaa A; Vallée F
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jun; 114(6):893-900. PubMed ID: 25735709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?
    Li H; Critchley LA; Zhang J
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 26315476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of continous-wave Doppler ultrasound monitor and echocardiography to assess cardiac output in intensive care patients.
    Elgendy A; Seppelt IM; Lane AS
    Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Sep; 19(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 28866972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Cardiac Output by Nine Different Pulse Contour Algorithms in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Comparison with Transpulmonary Thermodilution.
    Broch O; Bein B; Gruenewald M; Masing S; Huenges K; Haneya A; Steinfath M; Renner J
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():3468015. PubMed ID: 28116294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care.
    Bataille B; Bertuit M; Mora M; Mazerolles M; Cocquet P; Masson B; Moussot PE; Ginot J; Silva S; Larché J
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Dec; 109(6):879-86. PubMed ID: 22907340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    Terada T; Oiwa A; Maemura Y; Robert S; Kessoku S; Ochiai R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 26370094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults.
    Zhang J; Critchley LA; Lee DC; Khaw KS; Lee SW
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 26873749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods].
    Zheng ML; Sun X; Zhong J; He SR; Pan W; Pang CC; Sun YX; Liu YM
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23527933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous noninvasive cardiac output determination using the CNAP system: evaluation of a cardiac output algorithm for the analysis of volume clamp method-derived pulse contour.
    Wagner JY; Grond J; Fortin J; Negulescu I; Schöfthaler M; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Aug; 30(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 26227161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter.
    Thom O; Taylor DM; Wolfe RE; Cade J; Myles P; Krum H; Wolfe R
    Br J Anaesth; 2009 Dec; 103(6):800-4. PubMed ID: 19864307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transesophageal Doppler reliably tracks changes in cardiac output in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.
    Møller-Sørensen H; Cordtz J; Østergaard M; Nilsson JC; Hansen KL
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 26578096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.
    McNamara H; Barclay P; Sharma V
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 25005720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ability of esCCO to track changes in cardiac output.
    Biais M; Berthezène R; Petit L; Cottenceau V; Sztark F
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 26209443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients.
    Bendjelid K; Marx G; Kiefer N; Simon TP; Geisen M; Hoeft A; Siegenthaler N; Hofer CK
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 111(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 23625132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between continuous non-invasive estimated cardiac output by pulse wave transit time and thermodilution method.
    Sinha AC; Singh PM; Grewal N; Aman M; Dubowitz G
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2014; 17(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 25281622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs.
    Critchley LA; Peng ZY; Fok BS; Lee A; Phillips RA
    Anesth Analg; 2005 Mar; 100(3):748-753. PubMed ID: 15728064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.
    Smetkin AA; Hussain A; Fot EV; Zakharov VI; Izotova NN; Yudina AS; Dityateva ZA; Gromova YV; Kuzkov VV; Bjertnæs LJ; Kirov MY
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 26951494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.