1122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26245164)
1. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?
Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA.
Pour AE; Borden R; Murayama T; Groll-Brown M; Blaha JD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 26324837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.
Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modular to Monoblock: Difficulties of Detaching the M(2)a-Magnum(TM) Head Are Common in Metal-on-metal Revisions.
Mäntymäki H; Mäkelä KT; Vahlberg T; Hirviniemi J; Niinimäki T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):1999-2005. PubMed ID: 26940470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Abdel MP; Cottino U; Larson DR; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):873-881. PubMed ID: 28509828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. LUMiC
Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA?
Baek SH; Kim WK; Kim JY; Kim SY
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3796-802. PubMed ID: 26126991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.
Zhang Q; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Huddleston JI
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 26245165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exchangeable Femoral Neck (Dual-Modular) THA Prostheses Have Poorer Survivorship Than Other Designs: A Nationwide Cohort of 324,108 Patients.
Colas S; Allalou A; Poichotte A; Piriou P; Dray-Spira R; Zureik M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 475(8):2046-2059. PubMed ID: 28194710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27188835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complex revision total hip arthroplasty with modular stems at a mean of 14 years.
McCarthy JC; Lee JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():166-9. PubMed ID: 17891035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions?
Tetreault MW; Shukla SK; Yi PH; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):577-83. PubMed ID: 23846608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications.
Morison Z; Moojen DJ; Nauth A; Hall J; McKee MD; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 26335343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of modular tapered versus modular cylindrical stems for complex femoral revisions.
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Study Group
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):71-3. PubMed ID: 24034509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Huang Y; Zhou Y; Shao H; Gu J; Tang H; Tang Q
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3108-3113. PubMed ID: 28602532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
