368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26245275)
1. Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology, occlusion, and aesthetics.
Kollmuss M; Kist S; Goeke JE; Hickel R; Huth KC
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):791-7. PubMed ID: 26245275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of occlusal contact errors of 6 chairside CAD/CAM crowns: a self-controlled clinical study.
Pan Y; Lin H; Wang Y; Jiang L; Cheng Y; Yu H; Cheng H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Mar; 27(3):1301-1310. PubMed ID: 36333533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A pilot clinical study of immediate provisionalization with a chairside computer aided design and computer aided manufacture monolithic crown for single tooth immediate implant placement].
Tian JH; Di P; Lin Y; Zhang Y; Wei DH; Cui HY
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 52(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 28072987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique.
Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
Sailer I; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the precision of reproducibility of computer-aided occlusal design to conventional methods.
Muric A; Gokcen Röhlig B; Ongul D; Evlioglu G
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 30446412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions.
Tamim H; Skjerven H; Ekfeldt A; Rønold HJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 25010876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems.
Kirsch C; Ender A; Attin T; Mehl A
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):551-558. PubMed ID: 27469100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM composite resin and ceramic crowns before and after internal adjustment.
Tabata LF; de Lima Silva TA; de Paula Silveira AC; Ribeiro APD
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):500-505. PubMed ID: 31307805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Crystallization Firing on Marginal Gap of CAD/CAM Fabricated Lithium Disilicate Crowns.
Gold SA; Ferracane JL; da Costa J
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):63-66. PubMed ID: 28514042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
