These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26245425)

  • 1. An analysis of blood pressure measurement in a primary care hospital in Swaziland.
    Mlawanda G; Pather M; Govender S
    Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med; 2014 Dec; 6(1):E1-9. PubMed ID: 26245425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of an ambulatory blood pressure measuring device and a wrist blood pressure monitor with a position sensor versus a mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Altunkan S; Genç Y; Altunkan E
    Eur J Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 18(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17338963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Oscillometric wrist devices: comparison with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer and estimate of the "supine" error].
    Caridi G; Zoccali C; Enia G
    G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 14732910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How well do clinic-based blood pressure measurements agree with the mercury standard?
    Kim JW; Bosworth HB; Voils CI; Olsen M; Dudley T; Gribbin M; Adams M; Oddone EZ
    J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jul; 20(7):647-9. PubMed ID: 16050862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Value of blood pressure of adults depending on method of measurement].
    Wielemborek-Musiał K; Jegier A
    Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2006 Jun; 115(6):529-34. PubMed ID: 17263224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor and an EasyClick cuff according to the International Protocol in adults.
    Ilman N; Altunkan S; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 17303987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Blood pressure measurement by primary care physicians: comparison with the standard method].
    Asai Y; Kawamoto R; Nago N; Kajii E
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2000 Apr; 47(4):326-36. PubMed ID: 10835894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can wrist blood pressure oscillometer be used for triage in an adult emergency department?
    Rutschmann OT; Sarasin FP; Simon J; Vermeulen B; Riberdy L; Pechere-Bertschi A
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Aug; 46(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 16046950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers.
    Arosio E; Zannoni M
    Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E).
    Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.