BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26247264)

  • 21. The dawn of perfusion CMR: taking over from FFR in suspected coronary artery disease?
    Westwood MA; Ghosh AK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(11):1106-7. PubMed ID: 25459591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
    Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Management of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.
    Ramadan R; Boden WE; Kinlay S
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Mar; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 29605817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On tests, times, and the test of time..
    Achenbach S; Chandrashekhar Y; Narula J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1187-9. PubMed ID: 23153924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A digital tool for incorporating right atrial pressure into fractional flow reserve determination.
    Meah S; Gurm HS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 92(3):E204-E205. PubMed ID: 27885795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic and Prognostic Efficacy of Coronary Flow Capacity Obtained Using Pressure-Temperature Sensor-Tipped Wire-Derived Physiological Indices.
    Hamaya R; Yonetsu T; Kanaji Y; Usui E; Hoshino M; Yamaguchi M; Hada M; Kanno Y; Murai T; Hirao K; Kakuta T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(8):728-737. PubMed ID: 29605243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Coronary artery disease diagnostic with fractional flow reserve].
    Trana C; Muller O; Eeckhout E
    Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Jun; 7(297):1182-8. PubMed ID: 21717690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. No Stenosis Left Behind - The Holy Grail of 100% Predictive Accuracy.
    Wilentz JR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 28(7):271-2. PubMed ID: 27342203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-Term Patency of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Implantation.
    Fournier S; Toth GG; Colaiori I; De Bruyne B; Barbato E
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 12(5):e007712. PubMed ID: 31084238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The one-stop shop offering both coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion: may well be opening soon, around the corner.
    Wijns W
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1112-4. PubMed ID: 23153910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. President's Page.
    Leipsic JA
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(6):604-5. PubMed ID: 26411313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Hemodynamic Significance of Stenosis in Multiple Involvement of the Coronary Vessels by Mathematical Simulation.
    Simakov SS; Gamilov TM; Kopylov FY; Vasilevskii YV
    Bull Exp Biol Med; 2016 Nov; 162(1):111-114. PubMed ID: 27878495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Current developments and future applications of intracoronary hemodynamics.
    Coverstone E; Shapiro R; Singh J
    Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug; 26(5):448-58. PubMed ID: 25946656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Targeting the dominant mechanism of coronary microvascular dysfunction with intracoronary physiology tests.
    Mejía-Rentería H; van der Hoeven N; van de Hoef TP; Heemelaar J; Ryan N; Lerman A; van Royen N; Escaned J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):1041-1059. PubMed ID: 28501910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio a New Standard of Care for Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Lesions? More Questions Than Answers.
    Kern MJ; Seto AH
    Circulation; 2017 Dec; 136(24):2295-2297. PubMed ID: 29229617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 3D OCT versus FFR for jailed side-branch ostial stenoses.
    Ha J; Kim JS; Mintz GS; Kim BK; Shin DH; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Feb; 7(2):204-5. PubMed ID: 24524746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Applicability and Interpretation of Coronary Physiology in the Setting of a Chronic Total Occlusion.
    Allahwala UK; Brilakis ES; Byrne J; Davies JE; Ward MR; Weaver JC; Bhindi R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(7):e007813. PubMed ID: 31272226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Funtional significance of the intermediate lesion in a single coronary artery assessed by fractional flow reserve.
    Ha SJ; Kwon SH; Kim SJ
    Korean J Intern Med; 2014 Nov; 29(6):822-4. PubMed ID: 25378982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology: Do We Need Alternatives to Fractional Flow Reserve?
    De Maria GL; Garcia-Garcia HM; Scarsini R; Hideo-Kajita A; Gonzalo López N; Leone AM; Sarno G; Daemen J; Shlofmitz E; Jeremias A; Tebaldi M; Bezerra HG; Tu S; Lemos PA; Ozaki Y; Dan K; Collet C; Banning AP; Barbato E; Johnson NP; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 13(4):e008487. PubMed ID: 32295416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is the Intracoronary Electrocardiogram Lesion Specific?
    Aslanger E; Şimşek MA; Cabbar AT; Özveren O; Değertekin M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(23):e217-e218. PubMed ID: 29153497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.