These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26247853)

  • 1. Energy Impacts of Wide Band Gap Semiconductors in U.S. Light-Duty Electric Vehicle Fleet.
    Warren JA; Riddle ME; Graziano DJ; Das S; Upadhyayula VK; Masanet E; Cresko J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 49(17):10294-302. PubMed ID: 26247853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards.
    Jenn A; Azevedo IM; Michalek JJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 50(5):2165-74. PubMed ID: 26867100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Light-Duty Transport in Line with the 2 °C Target.
    Zhu Y; Skerlos S; Xu M; Cooper DR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(13):9326-9338. PubMed ID: 34106694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coordinated EV adoption: double-digit reductions in emissions and fuel use for $40/vehicle-year.
    Choi DG; Kreikebaum F; Thomas VM; Divan D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 47(18):10703-7. PubMed ID: 23875888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of the Fuel Saving, Life Cycle GHG Emission, and Ownership Cost Impacts of Lightweighting Vehicles with Different Powertrains.
    Luk JM; Kim HC; De Kleine R; Wallington TJ; MacLean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Aug; 51(15):8215-8228. PubMed ID: 28714678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How much do electric drive vehicles matter to future U.S. emissions?
    Babaee S; Nagpure AS; DeCarolis JF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(3):1382-90. PubMed ID: 24386958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regional Variability and Uncertainty of Electric Vehicle Life Cycle CO₂ Emissions across the United States.
    Tamayao MA; Michalek JJ; Hendrickson C; Azevedo IM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(14):8844-55. PubMed ID: 26125323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Research on carbon reduction potential of electric vehicles for low-carbon transportation and its influencing factors].
    Shi XQ; Li XN; Yang JX
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Jan; 34(1):385-94. PubMed ID: 23487966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Future methane emissions from the heavy-duty natural gas transportation sector for stasis, high, medium, and low scenarios in 2035.
    Clark NN; Johnson DR; McKain DL; Wayne WS; Li H; Rudek J; Mongold RA; Sandoval C; Covington AN; Hailer JT
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Dec; 67(12):1328-1341. PubMed ID: 28829681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential impacts of electric vehicles on air quality in Taiwan.
    Li N; Chen JP; Tsai IC; He Q; Chi SY; Lin YC; Fu TM
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 566-567():919-928. PubMed ID: 27285533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental and Economic Trade-Offs of City Vehicle Fleet Electrification and Photovoltaic Installation in the U.S. PJM Interconnection.
    Mersky AC; Samaras C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 54(1):380-389. PubMed ID: 31765560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental and energy implications of plug-in hybrid-electric vehicles.
    Stephan CH; Sullivan J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Feb; 42(4):1185-90. PubMed ID: 18351091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Life cycle air emissions impacts and ownership costs of light-duty vehicles using natural gas as a primary energy source.
    Luk JM; Saville BA; MacLean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5151-60. PubMed ID: 25825338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Achieving deep cuts in the carbon intensity of U.S. automobile transportation by 2050: complementary roles for electricity and biofuels.
    Scown CD; Taptich M; Horvath A; McKone TE; Nazaroff WW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Aug; 47(16):9044-52. PubMed ID: 23906086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The recession of 2008 and its impact on light-duty vehicle emissions in three western United States cities.
    Bishop GA; Stedman DH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14822-7. PubMed ID: 25426705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carbon emission of energy consumption of the electric vehicle development scenario.
    Wang M; Wang Y; Chen L; Yang Y; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(31):42401-42413. PubMed ID: 33813710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Private versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration, and Cost Impacts.
    Sheppard CJR; Jenn AT; Greenblatt JB; Bauer GS; Gerke BF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 55(5):3229-3239. PubMed ID: 33566604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emissions and Cost Implications of Controlled Electric Vehicle Charging in the U.S. PJM Interconnection.
    Weis A; Michalek JJ; Jaramillo P; Lueken R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5813-9. PubMed ID: 25830471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regional on-road vehicle running emissions modeling and evaluation for conventional and alternative vehicle technologies.
    Frey HC; Zhai H; Rouphail NM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(21):8449-55. PubMed ID: 19924983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How Well Do We Know the Future of CO
    Martin NP; Bishop JD; Boies AM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 51(5):3093-3101. PubMed ID: 28178418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.