These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set. Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Structural motifs at protein-protein interfaces: protein cores versus two-state and three-state model complexes. Tsai CJ; Xu D; Nussinov R Protein Sci; 1997 Sep; 6(9):1793-805. PubMed ID: 9300480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accurate Prediction of Docked Protein Structure Similarity. Akbal-Delibas B; Pomplun M; Haspel N J Comput Biol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):892-904. PubMed ID: 26335807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: unbound structures for docking. Gao Y; Douguet D; Tovchigrechko A; Vakser IA Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):845-51. PubMed ID: 17803215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Novel 3D bio-macromolecular bilinear descriptors for protein science: Predicting protein structural classes. Marrero-Ponce Y; Contreras-Torres E; García-Jacas CR; Barigye SJ; Cubillán N; Alvarado YJ J Theor Biol; 2015 Jun; 374():125-37. PubMed ID: 25843214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations. Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. DynBench3D, a Web-Resource to Dynamically Generate Benchmark Sets of Large Heteromeric Protein Complexes. Bertoni M; Aloy P J Mol Biol; 2018 Oct; 430(21):4431-4438. PubMed ID: 30274705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative assessment of ranking accuracies of conventional and machine-learning-based scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction. Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1301-13. PubMed ID: 22411892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Native fold and docking pose discrimination by the same residue-based scoring function. Sarti E; Granata D; Seno F; Trovato A; Laio A Proteins; 2015 Apr; 83(4):621-30. PubMed ID: 25619680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Framework to Simplify Combined Sampling Strategies in Rosetta. Porter JR; Weitzner BD; Lange OF PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138220. PubMed ID: 26381271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Information-driven modeling of large macromolecular assemblies using NMR data. van Ingen H; Bonvin AM J Magn Reson; 2014 Apr; 241():103-14. PubMed ID: 24656083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Flexible protein docking refinement using pose-dependent normal mode analysis. Venkatraman V; Ritchie DW Proteins; 2012 Aug; 80(9):2262-74. PubMed ID: 22610423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Protein docking using case-based reasoning. Ghoorah AW; Devignes MD; Smaïl-Tabbone M; Ritchie DW Proteins; 2013 Dec; 81(12):2150-8. PubMed ID: 24123156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]