BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26248969)

  • 1. Effect of contralateral stimulation on acoustic reflectance measurements.
    Pichelli TS; Soares JC; Cibin BC; Carvallo RM
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 26248969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Could the Use of Acoustic Reflexes Prior to Administering Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) Affect the Results of DPOAEs?
    Garrette R; Jones AL; Wilson MW
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):349-353. PubMed ID: 29800116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic immittance in children without otoacoustic emissions.
    Linares AE; Carvallo RM
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2008; 74(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 18661016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying Otosclerosis with Aural Acoustical Tests of Absorbance, Group Delay, Acoustic Reflex Threshold, and Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Keefe DH; Archer KL; Schmid KK; Fitzpatrick DF; Feeney MP; Hunter LL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):838-860. PubMed ID: 28972472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of subtle auditory dysfunctions in young normal-hearing subjects affected by Williams syndrome.
    Paglialonga A; Barozzi S; Brambilla D; Soi D; Cesarani A; Spreafico E; Tognola G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Nov; 78(11):1861-5. PubMed ID: 25193583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does Contralateral Inhibition of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Suggest Sex or Ear Laterality Effects?
    Stuart A; Kerls AN
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):272-282. PubMed ID: 29946686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing critical differences in ear-canal stimulus amplitude for detecting middle ear muscle reflex activation during olivocochlear efferent measurements.
    Mertes IB
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 31584306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of static middle ear pressure on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Plinkert PK; Bootz F; Vossieck T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1994; 251(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 8024768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of efferent acoustic reflex activation on psychoacoustical tuning curves in humans.
    Quaranta N; Scaringi A; Nahum S; Quaranta A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):520-3. PubMed ID: 16092544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
    Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Bulut E; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hyperactive auditory efferent system and lack of acoustic reflexes in Williams syndrome.
    Attias J; Raveh E; Ben-Naftali NF; Zarchi O; Gothelf D
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2008; 19(3-4):193-207. PubMed ID: 19025031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebello-pontine angle tumor.
    Ferguson MA; O'Donoghue GM; Owen V
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 11409853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Deeter R; Abel R; Calandruccio L; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2413-24. PubMed ID: 19894823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.