233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26250351)
1. Advancing the Rigour and Integrity of Our Science: The Registered Reports Initiative.
Probst TM; Hagger MS
Stress Health; 2015 Aug; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 26250351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Publishing in learned journals.
Arseculeratne SN
Indian J Med Res; 2010 Nov; 132(5):525-6. PubMed ID: 21150003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Scientific reports: responsibility for quality].
Balzer K
Pflege; 2013 Dec; 26(6):383-5. PubMed ID: 24297827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peering into the review process.
Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The peer review process: Giving and receiving advice.
Jull G; Moore A
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2019 Apr; 40():v. PubMed ID: 30773425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Harefuah peer review].
Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Rejection of the rejection of scientific articles].
Füeßl HS
MMW Fortschr Med; 2016 Feb; 158(2):33. PubMed ID: 26961033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?
Lüscher TF; Gersh B; Hindricks G; Landmesser U; Nallamothu B; Ruschitzka F; Wijns W
Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 23132609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Article review process.
Burr G
Confed Aust Crit Care Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 4(3):17. PubMed ID: 1912646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Diversity, debate, and discourse.
Haller KB
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(4):283. PubMed ID: 1941289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Extended publication guidelines for the reporting of clinical research in Clinical and Experimental Metastasis.
Haier J; Sleeman JP
Clin Exp Metastasis; 2017 Dec; 34(8):441-442. PubMed ID: 29516209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
Glimelius B
Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of scientific publications and professional life of a scientist].
Reverter Masià J
Nutr Hosp; 2012; 27(4):1368-9. PubMed ID: 23165589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perfecting peer review?
Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific journal publishing is too complex to be measured by a single metric: time to review the role of the impact factor!
Pirmez C; Brandão AA; Momen H
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz; 2016 Sep; 111(9):543-4. PubMed ID: 27653358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
