These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26251308)

  • 41. Examining the relationship between triage acuity and frailty to inform the care of older emergency department patients: Findings from a large Canadian multisite cohort study.
    Mowbray F; Brousseau AA; Mercier E; Melady D; Émond M; Costa AP
    CJEM; 2020 Jan; 22(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 31718719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reliability and accuracy of the South African Triage Scale when used by nurses in the emergency department of Timergara Hospital, Pakistan.
    Dalwai MK; Twomey M; Maikere J; Said S; Wakeel M; Jemmy JP; Valles P; Tayler-Smith K; Wallis L; Zachariah R
    S Afr Med J; 2014 Mar; 104(5):372-5. PubMed ID: 25212207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a prospective multicenter evaluation.
    Gravel J; Gouin S; Goldman RD; Osmond MH; Fitzpatrick E; Boutis K; Guimont C; Joubert G; Millar K; Curtis S; Sinclair D; Amre D
    Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Jul; 60(1):71-7.e3. PubMed ID: 22305329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of a formal triage scoring system and a quick-look triage approach.
    Betz M; Stempien J; Wilde A; Bryce R
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Jun; 23(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 25622182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients.
    Lee JY; Oh SH; Peck EH; Lee JM; Park KN; Kim SH; Youn CS
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 19():68. PubMed ID: 22050641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Validity and Reliability of Emergency Severity Index and Conventional Three-Tier Triage System in the Emergency Department, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia.
    Lim BJV; Wahab SFA; Kueh YC
    Malays J Med Sci; 2020 Mar; 27(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 32788845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Utilizing the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in an oncology urgent care clinic: the university health network experience.
    Trip K; Boloorchi A; Berman H
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2011; 21(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 21462878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Modern triage in the emergency department.
    Christ M; Grossmann F; Winter D; Bingisser R; Platz E
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2010 Dec; 107(50):892-8. PubMed ID: 21246025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center.
    Gravel J; Gouin S; Manzano S; Arsenault M; Amre D
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1262-7. PubMed ID: 18945238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. First evaluation of the paediatric version of the Swedish rapid emergency triage and treatment system shows good reliability.
    Westergren H; Ferm M; Häggström P
    Acta Paediatr; 2014 Mar; 103(3):305-8. PubMed ID: 24180302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Impacts of the introduction of a triage system in Japan: a time series study.
    Hamamoto J; Yamase H; Yamase Y
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2014 Jul; 22(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 24210955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients.
    Baumann MR; Strout TD
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Mar; 12(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 15741584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reliability of a computerized version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale.
    Gravel J; Gouin S; Bailey B; Roy M; Bergeron S; Amre D
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Oct; 14(10):864-9. PubMed ID: 17761546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool.
    Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Blitz S; Akhmetshin E; Ohinmaa A; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 17200513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Predictors of Low-Acuity Emergency Department Use by Patients Enrolled in a Family Health Team.
    Jones P; Jones J; O'Brien K; Lee-Poy M
    CJEM; 2015 Jul; 17(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 26134052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A determination of emergency department pre-triage times in patients not arriving by ambulance compared to widely used guideline recommendations.
    Betz M; Stempien J; Trivedi S; Bryce R
    CJEM; 2017 Jul; 19(4):265-270. PubMed ID: 27917744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Repeatability of the Manchester Triage System for children.
    van Veen M; Teunen-van der Walle VF; Steyerberg EW; van Meurs AH; Ruige M; Strout TD; van der Lei J; Moll HA
    Emerg Med J; 2010 Jul; 27(7):512-6. PubMed ID: 20515904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A pilot study examining the speed and accuracy of triage for simulated disaster patients in an emergency department setting: Comparison of a computerized version of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) methods.
    Curran-Sills G; Franc JM
    CJEM; 2017 Sep; 19(5):364-371. PubMed ID: 27788698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The South African Triage Scale (adult version) provides reliable acuity ratings.
    Twomey M; Wallis LA; Thompson ML; Myers JE
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2012 Jul; 20(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 22726946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reliability of ChatGPT for performing triage task in the emergency department using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale.
    Kim JH; Kim SK; Choi J; Lee Y
    Digit Health; 2024; 10():20552076241227132. PubMed ID: 38250148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.