These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26251754)

  • 61. Is laparoscopic pyeloplasty a comparable option to treat Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)? A comparative study.
    Memon MA; Biyabani SR; Ghirano R; Aziz W; Siddiqui KM
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Mar; 66(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 26968286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Başataç C; Boylu U; Önol FF; Gümüş E
    Turk J Urol; 2014 Mar; 40(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 26328141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Ureteropelvic obstruction and renal stones: etiology and treatment.
    Skolarikos A; Dellis A; Knoll T
    Urolithiasis; 2015 Feb; 43(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 25362543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.
    Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty.
    Sukumar S; Sun M; Karakiewicz PI; Friedman AA; Chun FK; Sammon J; Ghani KR; Ravi P; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Peabody JO; Elder JS; Menon M; Trinh QD
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):913-8. PubMed ID: 22819404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
    Guliev BG
    Urologiia; 2019 Sep; (4):16-19. PubMed ID: 31535799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.
    Varda BK; Wang Y; Chung BI; Lee RS; Kurtz MP; Nelson CP; Chang SL
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):336.e1-336.e8. PubMed ID: 29530407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of the current status.
    Shah KK; Louie M; Thaly RK; Patel VR
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():35-40. PubMed ID: 17441024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?
    Zamfir Snykers C; De Plaen E; Vermersch S; Lopez M; Khelif K; Luyckx S; Philippe P; Varlet F; Steyaert H
    Front Pediatr; 2019; 7():352. PubMed ID: 31608264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Thiel DD; Winfield HN
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2007 Jun; 59(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 17571053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
    Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.
    Gao ZL; Shi L; Yang MS; Wang L; Yang DD; Sun DK; Liu QZ; Men CP; Wu JT; Zhang P
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 May; 119(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 16732987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases.
    Jarrett TW; Chan DY; Charambura TC; Fugita O; Kavoussi LR
    J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1253-6. PubMed ID: 11832708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants.
    Boysen WR; Gundeti MS
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2017 Sep; 33(9):925-935. PubMed ID: 28365863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
    Casale P
    Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 19057224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results.
    Eden CG
    Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):983-9. PubMed ID: 17629395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
    Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technique and results in 80 consecutive patients.
    Castillo OA; Cabrera W; Aleman E; Vidal-Mora I; Yañez R
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Mar; 38(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 23910728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty procedures: a series of 18 patients.
    Ener K; Altınova S; Canda AE; Özcan MF; Asil E; Ürer E; Atmaca AF; Akbulut Z
    Turk J Urol; 2014 Dec; 40(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 26328177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Minimally invasive approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Canes D; Berger A; Gettman MT; Desai MM
    Urol Clin North Am; 2008 Aug; 35(3):425-39, viii. PubMed ID: 18761197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.