135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26251768)
1. Economic Performance of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF) with a Focus on Hospital Throughput Efficiency.
Abbasi H; Murphy CM
Cureus; 2015 Jul; 7(7):e292. PubMed ID: 26251768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Open Fusions: A Multivariant Analysis.
Abbasi H; Grant A
Cureus; 2018 Mar; 10(3):e2288. PubMed ID: 29770280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF): Technical Notes and Early Results of a Single Surgeon Comparative Study.
Abbasi H; Abbasi A
Cureus; 2015 Oct; 7(10):e351. PubMed ID: 26623206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery with Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Single Surgeon Feasibility Study.
Abbasi H; Miller L; Abbasi A; Orandi V; Khaghany K
Cureus; 2017 Jun; 9(6):e1389. PubMed ID: 28775929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transfacet Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Description and Early Results.
Abbasi H; Storlie NR; Aya KL
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e26533. PubMed ID: 35928391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physiologic Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Through Anatomic Restoration Using Trans-Kambin Oblique Lateral Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF): A Retrospective Analysis.
Abbasi H
Cureus; 2020 Nov; 12(11):e11716. PubMed ID: 33269175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Abbasi A; Khaghany K; Orandi V; Abbasi H
Cureus; 2019 Feb; 11(2):e4029. PubMed ID: 31007987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost analysis of anterior-posterior circumferential fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Andres TM; Park JJ; Ricart Hoffiz PA; McHugh BJ; Warren DT; Errico TJ
Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 23353002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.
Virdee JS; Nadig A; Anagnostopoulos G; George KJ
Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 31(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 27331649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature.
Vazan M; Gempt J; Meyer B; Buchmann N; Ryang YM
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2017 Jun; 159(6):1137-1146. PubMed ID: 28160064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
