196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26251854)
1. Survey of Attitudes of Japanese Women Toward Genetic/Genomic Research.
Moriya H; Inoue I; Ikeuchi M; Ishii N; Motojima M
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):29-38. PubMed ID: 26251854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations.
Wright GE; Koornhof PG; Adeyemo AA; Tiffin N
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 May; 14():21. PubMed ID: 23714101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Professionals' attitudes regarding large-scale genetic information generated through next generation sequencing in research: a pilot study.
Miller J; Soulier A; Bertier G; Cambon-Thomsen A
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):56-8. PubMed ID: 25746785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic research and data-mining technology: implications for personal privacy and informed consent.
Tavani HT
Ethics Inf Technol; 2004; 6(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16969958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain.
Ruiz-Canela M; Valle-Mansilla JI; Sulmasy DP
J Med Ethics; 2009 Apr; 35(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 19332583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Harvard case of Xu Xiping: exploitation of the people, scientific advance, or genetic theft?
Sleeboom M
New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):57-78. PubMed ID: 16552917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do patients and research subjects have a right to receive their genomic raw data? An ethical and legal analysis.
Schickhardt C; Fleischer H; Winkler EC
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 31948449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Privacy issues in second stage genomics.
Robertson JA
Jurimetrics; 1999; 40():59-76. PubMed ID: 14621715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public attitudes to the promotion of genomic crop studies in Japan: correlations between genomic literacy, trust, and favourable attitude.
Ishiyama I; Tanzawa T; Watanabe M; Maeda T; Muto K; Tamakoshi A; Nagai A; Yamagata Z
Public Underst Sci; 2012 May; 21(4):495-512. PubMed ID: 23038861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M;
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study.
Kraft SA; Porter KM; Duenas DM; Guerra C; Joseph G; Lee SS; Shipman KJ; Allen J; Eubanks D; Kauffman TL; Lindberg NM; Anderson K; Zepp JM; Gilmore MJ; Mittendorf KF; Shuster E; Muessig KR; Arnold B; Goddard KAB; Wilfond BS
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 32981477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consent to 'personal' genomics and privacy. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests and population genome research challenge traditional notions of privacy and consent.
Knoppers BM
EMBO Rep; 2010 Jun; 11(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 20448662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives.
Oliver JM; Slashinski MJ; Wang T; Kelly PA; Hilsenbeck SG; McGuire AL
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 22213783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Following the giant's paces-governance issues and bioethical reflections in China.
Wang Z; Zhang D; Ng VH; Lie R; Zhai X
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Oct; 15():79. PubMed ID: 25361573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchers.
Edwards KL; Lemke AA; Trinidad SB; Lewis SM; Starks H; Quinn Griffin MT; Wiesner GL
Public Health Genomics; 2011; 14(6):337-45. PubMed ID: 21487211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals' Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing.
Vears DF; Borry P; Savulescu J; Koplin JJ
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 33017265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of Attitudes to the Ethical Issues Raised by the Return of Incidental Genomic Research Findings in Children: A Follow-Up Study.
Fernandez CV; OʼConnell C; Ferguson M; Orr AC; Robitaille JM; Knoppers BM; McMaster CR
Public Health Genomics; 2015; 18(5):299-308. PubMed ID: 26352440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pragmatic Tools for Sharing Genomic Research Results with the Relatives of Living and Deceased Research Participants.
Wolf SM; Scholtes E; Koenig BA; Petersen GM; Berry SA; Beskow LM; Daly MB; Fernandez CV; Green RC; LeRoy BS; Lindor NM; O'Rourke PP; Breitkopf CR; Rothstein MA; Van Ness B; Wilfond BS
J Law Med Ethics; 2018 Mar; 46(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 30008546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: preliminary findings based on focus group interviews.
Asai A; Ohnishi M; Nishigaki E; Sekimoto M; Fukuhara S; Fukui T
BMC Med Ethics; 2002 Jan; 3():E1. PubMed ID: 11825345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Japanese Translation and Validation of Genomic Knowledge Measure in the International Genetics Literacy and Attitudes Survey (iGLAS-GK).
Yoshida A; Tokutomi T; Fukushima A; Chapman R; Selita F; Kovas Y; Sasaki M
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 37107572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]