BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26252193)

  • 1. Development of municipal solid waste classification in Korea based on fossil carbon fraction.
    Lee J; Kang S; Kim S; Kim KH; Jeon EC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Oct; 65(10):1256-60. PubMed ID: 26252193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The study on biomass fraction estimate methodology of municipal solid waste incinerator in Korea.
    Kang S; Kim S; Lee J; Yun H; Kim KH; Jeon EC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Oct; 66(10):971-7. PubMed ID: 27191178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved method for calculating CO
    Liu G; Huang Q; Song K; Pan Y; Zhang H
    Waste Manag; 2024 Feb; 174():164-173. PubMed ID: 38056365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The comparison of fossil carbon fraction and greenhouse gas emissions through an analysis of exhaust gases from urban solid waste incineration facilities.
    Kim S; Kang S; Lee J; Lee S; Kim KH; Jeon EC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Oct; 66(10):978-87. PubMed ID: 27580473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The estimation of N2O emissions from municipal solid waste incineration facilities: The Korea case.
    Park S; Choi JH; Park J
    Waste Manag; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1765-71. PubMed ID: 21478007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout.
    Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emission of greenhouse gases from waste incineration in Korea.
    Hwang KL; Choi SM; Kim MK; Heo JB; Zoh KD
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():710-718. PubMed ID: 28371748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of fossil carbon content in Swedish waste fuel by four different methods.
    Jones FC; Blomqvist EW; Bisaillon M; Lindberg DK; Hupa M
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):1052-61. PubMed ID: 23754147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biogenic carbon in combustible waste: waste composition, variability and measurement uncertainty.
    Larsen AW; Fuglsang K; Pedersen NH; Fellner J; Rechberger H; Astrup T
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10 Suppl):56-66. PubMed ID: 24008327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of CO
    Lee H; Yi SM; Holsen TM; Seo YS; Choi E
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():247-255. PubMed ID: 29221870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of applicability index for better management of municipal solid waste: a case study of Dhanbad, India.
    Yadav P; Samadder SR
    Environ Technol; 2018 Jun; 39(12):1481-1496. PubMed ID: 28513337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Life cycle assessment modelling of waste-to-energy incineration in Spain and Portugal.
    Margallo M; Aldaco R; Irabien A; Carrillo V; Fischer M; Bala A; Fullana P
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jun; 32(6):492-9. PubMed ID: 24951550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Greenhouse gas emissions from waste management--assessment of quantification methods.
    Mohareb EA; MacLean HL; Kennedy CA
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 May; 61(5):480-93. PubMed ID: 21608488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of introducing energy recovery processes to the municipal solid waste management system in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
    Toshiki K; Giang PQ; Serrona KR; Sekikawa T; Yu JS; Choijil B; Kunikane S
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Feb; 28():178-86. PubMed ID: 25662253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Classification and comparison of municipal solid waste based on thermochemical characteristics.
    Zhou H; Meng A; Long Y; Li Q; Zhang Y
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 May; 64(5):597-616. PubMed ID: 24941708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of different end-of-life management alternatives for used natural cork stoppers through life cycle assessment.
    Demertzi M; Dias AC; Matos A; Arroja LM
    Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():668-80. PubMed ID: 26427936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
    Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A case-study of landfill minimization and material recovery via waste co-gasification in a new waste management scheme.
    Tanigaki N; Ishida Y; Osada M
    Waste Manag; 2015 Mar; 37():137-46. PubMed ID: 25182227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of municipal solid waste management on greenhouse gas emissions in Malaysia and the way forward.
    Michel Devadoss PS; Agamuthu P; Mehran SB; Santha C; Fauziah SH
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jan; 119():135-144. PubMed ID: 33059163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Field assessment of semi-aerobic condition and the methane correction factor for the semi-aerobic landfills provided by IPCC guidelines.
    Jeong S; Nam A; Yi SM; Kim JY
    Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():197-203. PubMed ID: 25488731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.