These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Application of Shape Similarity in Pose Selection and Virtual Screening in CSARdock2014 Exercise. Kumar A; Zhang KY J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):965-73. PubMed ID: 26247231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predicting binding affinity of CSAR ligands using both structure-based and ligand-based approaches. Fourches D; Muratov E; Ding F; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1915-22. PubMed ID: 23809015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Novel Consensus Docking Strategy to Improve Ligand Pose Prediction. Ren X; Shi YS; Zhang Y; Liu B; Zhang LH; Peng YB; Zeng R J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1662-1668. PubMed ID: 30044626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions. Gathiaka S; Liu S; Chiu M; Yang H; Stuckey JA; Kang YN; Delproposto J; Kubish G; Dunbar JB; Carlson HA; Burley SK; Walters WP; Amaro RE; Feher VA; Gilson MK J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):651-668. PubMed ID: 27696240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power. Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ligand- and receptor-based docking with LiBELa. dos Santos Muniz H; Nascimento AS J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Aug; 29(8):713-23. PubMed ID: 26141308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A pose prediction approach based on ligand 3D shape similarity. Kumar A; Zhang KY J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Jun; 30(6):457-69. PubMed ID: 27379501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction. Brylinski M J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy. Wu Y; Brooks CL J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Nov; 61(11):5535-5549. PubMed ID: 34704754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results. Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative assessment of ranking accuracies of conventional and machine-learning-based scoring functions for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction. Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1301-13. PubMed ID: 22411892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]