BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26253041)

  • 1. What Burden of Prostate Cancer Can Radiologists Rule Out on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Sensitivity Analysis Based on Varying the Target Condition in Template Prostate Mapping Biopsies.
    Anastasiadis E; Charman SC; Arumainayagam N; Sohaib AS; Allen C; Freeman A; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
    Urology; 2015 Sep; 86(3):544-51. PubMed ID: 26253041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict upgrading of transrectal ultrasound biopsy results at more definitive histology?
    Abd-Alazeez M; Ahmed HU; Arya M; Allen C; Dikaios N; Freeman A; Emberton M; Kirkham A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 32(6):741-7. PubMed ID: 24981993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing clinically significant prostate cancer: Diagnostic properties of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging compared to three-dimensional transperineal template mapping histopathology.
    Tsivian M; Gupta RT; Tsivian E; Qi P; Mendez MH; Abern MR; Tay KJ; Polascik TJ
    Int J Urol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 27859637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3 + 4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy.
    Garcia-Reyes K; Nguyen HG; Zagoria RJ; Shinohara K; Carroll PR; Behr SC; Westphalen AC
    J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 28941918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Thompson JE; van Leeuwen PJ; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 26529298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level--can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Abd-Alazeez M; Ahmed HU; Arya M; Charman SC; Anastasiadis E; Freeman A; Emberton M; Kirkham A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):45.e17-22. PubMed ID: 24055430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
    Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
    J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.
    Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value.
    Felker ER; Wu J; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Raman SS; Huang J; Dorey F; Marks LS
    J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1421-1427. PubMed ID: 26674305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manually controlled targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: an early experience.
    Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Endo J; Hashida K; Tomonaga T; Nakano M; Sugiyama T; Tajiri T; Terachi T; Uchida T
    Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 25316213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refining the risk-stratification of transrectal biopsy-detected prostate cancer by elastic fusion registration transperineal biopsies.
    Covin B; Roumiguié M; Quintyn-Ranty ML; Graff P; Khalifa J; Aziza R; Ploussard G; Portalez D; Malavaud B
    World J Urol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):269-275. PubMed ID: 30145777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.
    Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D
    J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of multiparametric MRI in men at risk of prostate cancer before the first biopsy: a paired validating cohort study using template prostate mapping biopsies as the reference standard.
    Abd-Alazeez M; Kirkham A; Ahmed HU; Arya M; Anastasiadis E; Charman SC; Freeman A; Emberton M
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2014 Mar; 17(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24126797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.
    Tewes S; Hueper K; Hartung D; Imkamp F; Herrmann TR; Weidemann J; Renckly S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Peters I
    World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1707-14. PubMed ID: 25774003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
    Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
    J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What Type of Prostate Cancer Is Systematically Overlooked by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? An Analysis from the PROMIS Cohort.
    Norris JM; Carmona Echeverria LM; Bott SRJ; Brown LC; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; El-Shater Bosaily A; Frangou E; Freeman A; Ghei M; Henderson A; Hindley RG; Kaplan RS; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Persad R; Punwani S; Rosario DJ; Shergill IS; Stavrinides V; Winkler M; Whitaker HC; Ahmed HU; Emberton M
    Eur Urol; 2020 Aug; 78(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32370911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Kasivisvanathan V; Dufour R; Moore CM; Ahmed HU; Abd-Alazeez M; Charman SC; Freeman A; Allen C; Kirkham A; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
    J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):860-6. PubMed ID: 23063807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Added Value of Multiparametric Ultrasonography in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography Fusion-guided Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients With Suspicion for Prostate Cancer.
    Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Durmus T; Slowinski T; Cash H; Fischer T
    Urology; 2015 Jul; 86(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 26142593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.