248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26253323)
1. The processing of visual and auditory information for reaching movements.
Glazebrook CM; Welsh TN; Tremblay L
Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):757-73. PubMed ID: 26253323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space.
Fisk JD; Goodale MA
Exp Brain Res; 1985; 60(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 4043274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motor congruency and multisensory integration jointly facilitate visual information processing before movement execution.
Elshout JA; Van der Stoep N; Nijboer TCW; Van der Stigchel S
Exp Brain Res; 2020 Mar; 238(3):667-673. PubMed ID: 32036413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory cues for somatosensory targets invoke visuomotor transformations: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Manson GA; Tremblay L; Lebar N; de Grosbois J; Mouchnino L; Blouin J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0215518. PubMed ID: 31048853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Target modality affects visually guided online control of reaching.
Cameron BD; López-Moliner J
Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):233-43. PubMed ID: 24997229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of visual stimuli is improved by accompanying auditory stimuli: the role of eye movements and sound location.
Doyle MC; Snowden RJ
Perception; 2001; 30(7):795-810. PubMed ID: 11515953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fast, accurate reaching movements with a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device.
Levy-Tzedek S; Hanassy S; Abboud S; Maidenbaum S; Amedi A
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2012; 30(4):313-23. PubMed ID: 22596353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias.
Hairston WD; Wallace MT; Vaughan JW; Stein BE; Norris JL; Schirillo JA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 12590840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice reaching with a LEGO arm robot (CoRLEGO): The motor system guides visual attention to movement-relevant information.
Strauss S; Woodgate PJ; Sami SA; Heinke D
Neural Netw; 2015 Dec; 72():3-12. PubMed ID: 26667353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
Moehler T; Fiehler K
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ventriloquist in periphery: impact of eccentricity-related reliability on audio-visual localization.
Charbonneau G; Véronneau M; Boudrias-Fournier C; Lepore F; Collignon O
J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(12):20. PubMed ID: 24167163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a link between sensorimotor coordination and inter-manual coordination? Differential effects of auditory and/or visual rhythmic stimulations.
Blais M; Albaret JM; Tallet J
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3261-9. PubMed ID: 26238405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of visuomotor delays on the control of movement and on perceptual localization in the presence and absence of visual targets.
Avraham G; Sulimani E; Mussa-Ivaldi FA; Nisky I
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2259-2271. PubMed ID: 31577532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use.
Collins T; Schicke T; Röder B
Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 19012884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False reaching movements in localization test and effect of auditory feedback in simulated ultra-low vision subjects and patients with retinitis pigmentosa.
Endo T; Kanda H; Hirota M; Morimoto T; Nishida K; Fujikado T
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):947-56. PubMed ID: 26743752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impairment of online control of reaching movements with aging: a double-step study.
Sarlegna FR
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Aug; 403(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 16723186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online control of reaching and pointing to visual, auditory, and multimodal targets: Effects of target modality and method of determining correction latency.
Holmes NP; Dakwar AR
Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():105-16. PubMed ID: 26485660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of head position on the spatial representation of acoustic targets.
Goossens HH; van Opstal AJ
J Neurophysiol; 1999 Jun; 81(6):2720-36. PubMed ID: 10368392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of spatial response coding on distractor processing: evidence from auditory spatial negative priming tasks with keypress, joystick, and head movement responses.
Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):293-310. PubMed ID: 25214304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
