187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26254008)
1. QPROT: Statistical method for testing differential expression using protein-level intensity data in label-free quantitative proteomics.
Choi H; Kim S; Fermin D; Tsou CC; Nesvizhskii AI
J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():121-126. PubMed ID: 26254008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of statistical methods used for detecting differential expression in label-free mass spectrometry proteomics.
Langley SR; Mayr M
J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():83-92. PubMed ID: 26193490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. mapDIA: Preprocessing and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data from data independent acquisition mass spectrometry.
Teo G; Kim S; Tsou CC; Collins B; Gingras AC; Nesvizhskii AI; Choi H
J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():108-120. PubMed ID: 26381204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multi-model statistical approach for proteomic spectral count quantitation.
Branson OE; Freitas MA
J Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 144():23-32. PubMed ID: 27260494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance analysis of microarray for relative quantitation of LC/MS data in proteomics.
Roxas BA; Li Q
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 9():187. PubMed ID: 18402702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benchmarking quantitative label-free LC-MS data processing workflows using a complex spiked proteomic standard dataset.
Ramus C; Hovasse A; Marcellin M; Hesse AM; Mouton-Barbosa E; Bouyssié D; Vaca S; Carapito C; Chaoui K; Bruley C; Garin J; Cianférani S; Ferro M; Van Dorssaeler A; Burlet-Schiltz O; Schaeffer C; Couté Y; Gonzalez de Peredo A
J Proteomics; 2016 Jan; 132():51-62. PubMed ID: 26585461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ProtQuant: a tool for the label-free quantification of MudPIT proteomics data.
Bridges SM; Magee GB; Wang N; Williams WP; Burgess SC; Nanduri B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 8 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S24. PubMed ID: 18047724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the beta-binomial model for analysis of spectral count data in label-free tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
Pham TV; Piersma SR; Warmoes M; Jimenez CR
Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 26(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 20007255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ProteinInferencer: Confident protein identification and multiple experiment comparison for large scale proteomics projects.
Zhang Y; Xu T; Shan B; Hart J; Aslanian A; Han X; Zong N; Li H; Choi H; Wang D; Acharya L; Du L; Vogt PK; Ping P; Yates JR
J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():25-32. PubMed ID: 26196237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of different label-free mass spectrometry based protein abundance estimates and their correlation with RNA-Seq gene expression data.
Ning K; Fermin D; Nesvizhskii AI
J Proteome Res; 2012 Apr; 11(4):2261-71. PubMed ID: 22329341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A scoring model for phosphopeptide site localization and its impact on the question of whether to use MSA.
Fischer JSDG; Dos Santos MDM; Marchini FK; Barbosa VC; Carvalho PC; Zanchin NIT
J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():42-50. PubMed ID: 25623781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using weighted permutation scores to detect differential gene expression with microarray data.
Guo X; Pan W
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Aug; 3(4):989-1006. PubMed ID: 16078371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated image alignment for 2D gel electrophoresis in a high-throughput proteomics pipeline.
Dowsey AW; Dunn MJ; Yang GZ
Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(7):950-7. PubMed ID: 18310057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EBprot: Statistical analysis of labeling-based quantitative proteomics data.
Koh HW; Swa HL; Fermin D; Ler SG; Gunaratne J; Choi H
Proteomics; 2015 Aug; 15(15):2580-91. PubMed ID: 25913743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The APEX Quantitative Proteomics Tool: generating protein quantitation estimates from LC-MS/MS proteomics results.
Braisted JC; Kuntumalla S; Vogel C; Marcotte EM; Rodrigues AR; Wang R; Huang ST; Ferlanti ES; Saeed AI; Fleischmann RD; Peterson SN; Pieper R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():529. PubMed ID: 19068132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel approach for clustering proteomics data using Bayesian fast Fourier transform.
Bensmail H; Golek J; Moody MM; Semmes JO; Haoudi A
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2210-24. PubMed ID: 15769836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protein-Level Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Label-Free Proteomics Data with ProStaR.
Wieczorek S; Combes F; Borges H; Burger T
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1959():225-246. PubMed ID: 30852826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semi-supervised LC/MS alignment for differential proteomics.
Fischer B; Grossmann J; Roth V; Gruissem W; Baginsky S; Buhmann JM
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e132-40. PubMed ID: 16873463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Platform-independent and label-free quantitation of proteomic data using MS1 extracted ion chromatograms in skyline: application to protein acetylation and phosphorylation.
Schilling B; Rardin MJ; MacLean BX; Zawadzka AM; Frewen BE; Cusack MP; Sorensen DJ; Bereman MS; Jing E; Wu CC; Verdin E; Kahn CR; Maccoss MJ; Gibson BW
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2012 May; 11(5):202-14. PubMed ID: 22454539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of protein subcellular locations using a new measure of information discrepancy.
Jin L; Tang H; Fang W
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2005 Aug; 3(4):915-27. PubMed ID: 16078367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
