These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. On the importance of modeling fMRI transients when estimating effective connectivity: A dynamic causal modeling study using ASL data. Havlicek M; Roebroeck A; Friston KJ; Gardumi A; Ivanov D; Uludag K Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():217-233. PubMed ID: 28323165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining Excitatory and Inhibitory Neuronal Activity from Multimodal fMRI Data Using a Generative Hemodynamic Model. Havlicek M; Ivanov D; Roebroeck A; Uludağ K Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():616. PubMed ID: 29249925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physiological modeling of the BOLD signal and implications for effective connectivity: A primer. Uludağ K Neuroimage; 2023 Aug; 277():120249. PubMed ID: 37356779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling the impact of neurovascular coupling impairments on BOLD-based functional connectivity at rest. Archila-Meléndez ME; Sorg C; Preibisch C Neuroimage; 2020 Sep; 218():116871. PubMed ID: 32335261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biophysically based method to deconvolve spatiotemporal neurovascular signals from fMRI data. Pang JC; Aquino KM; Robinson PA; Lacy TC; Schira MM J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Oct; 308():6-20. PubMed ID: 30026070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Echo-time dependence of the BOLD response transients - A window into brain functional physiology. Havlicek M; Ivanov D; Poser BA; Uludag K Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():355-370. PubMed ID: 28729160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic Causal Modelling and physiological confounds: a functional MRI study of vagus nerve stimulation. Reyt S; Picq C; Sinniger V; Clarençon D; Bonaz B; David O Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1456-64. PubMed ID: 20472074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanistic Mathematical Modeling Tests Hypotheses of the Neurovascular Coupling in fMRI. Lundengård K; Cedersund G; Sten S; Leong F; Smedberg A; Elinder F; Engström M PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Jun; 12(6):e1004971. PubMed ID: 27310017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volumetric BOLD fMRI simulation: from neurovascular coupling to multivoxel imaging. Chen Z; Calhoun V BMC Med Imaging; 2012 Apr; 12():8. PubMed ID: 22524545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Buxton RB; Uludağ K; Dubowitz DJ; Liu TT Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S220-33. PubMed ID: 15501093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the post-stimulus undershoot with spin-echo fMRI: implications for models of neurovascular response. Poser BA; van Mierlo E; Norris DG Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Jan; 32(1):141-53. PubMed ID: 20623748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic Effective Connectivity using Physiologically informed Dynamic Causal Model with Recurrent Units: A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging simulation study. Nag S; Uludag K Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1001848. PubMed ID: 36936613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mutual connectivity analysis of resting-state functional MRI data with local models. DSouza AM; Abidin AZ; Chockanathan U; Schifitto G; Wismüller A Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():210-223. PubMed ID: 29777828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrated models of neurovascular coupling and BOLD signals: Responses for varying neural activations. Mathias EJ; Kenny A; Plank MJ; David T Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():69-86. PubMed ID: 29526745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]